小鱼儿
Topic Overlap & Value Expert
Review similar projects, identify research differences, and build a consistent case for your research object, theoretical value, practical value, and proposal format—while checking for potential risks.
Research Proposal Generator 5.0
Master orchestration skill: Enter a research topic to activate 10 sub-skills in one click and complete the full proposal workflow, from research background to final review and delivery. It includes three-stage confirmation gates, a cross-section consistency engine, automatic context transfer, and project file tracking to generate academic research proposals end to end.
Doomsday Grant Review Expert
Step 8 (Final Review v2): Review and diagnose the grant proposal from start to finish, based on the original “Three-Line” review framework from Lecture 7—inner line (topic rationale → research subject → framework → key points → main objective: what to do), outer line (challenges → approach → research methods: how to do it), and side line (plan + feasibility + innovation + foundation + references + outcomes: whether it can be done, from the reviewer’s perspective). Includes the 30-second rule, three points that determine the outcome, a hidden-killer scan, the divide between key points and challenges, the main objective as the intersection of the inner and outer lines, four reviewer questions scored on a 5-point scale, and revision priorities.
Remaining Sections Expert
Step 7: Generate all remaining sections, including the research foundation, materials preparation, research team roles, timeline, interim results, final results, and intended use of the results. Based on Lessons 71 and 72, first confirm the topic, then request the writing framework. Use the framework to determine which sections are needed, generate each section through iterative interaction, and perform an independent quality check on every section.
Doomsday Research Ideas Expert
Step 5.5: Research Approach (standalone skill), based on Lectures 68 and 7. You must read the research framework document before writing. Includes three templates: theory-building, policy-oriented, and mixed-methods research. Uses a closed-loop structure—“one-sentence overview → 4–5 detailed paragraphs → one-sentence conclusion”—with designated transition words, precise verbs, and → symbols to connect ideas. Produces 600–800 characters and prohibits vague language and weakly assertive statements.
Doomsday Innovation Expert
An expert skill for writing the “Innovations” section of applications to the National Social Science Fund of China and the Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences programs. Based on the Lecture 8 methodology and the 2024 revised application-form standards, it covers two major categories: academic viewpoints and research methods. Academic viewpoint innovations follow three models: theoretical integration, contextual modification, and problem reframing. Methodological innovations follow three paths: data sources, analytical tools, and interdisciplinary integration. It uses a “viewpoint statement + brief explanation” writing technique, with button confirmation at each step before proceeding.
Research Value Red Team
An expert skill for the research value section of National Social Science Fund and Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences applications—the Topic Collision Radar edition. Built on Lecture 8, Lecture 64, a case library of five winning proposal templates, and a knowledge base of 535 funded-project lists, it provides: topic-collision radar searches across three comparison levels (National Social Science Fund → Ministry of Education → provincial philosophy and social sciences), with project status labels → six-dimensional difference analysis and collision warnings → T1–T5 academic value formulas and A1–A4 applied value formulas → format-adaptive output ("Academic Value + Applied Value" for the National Social Science Fund application’s free-form section / "Theoretical Value + Practical Application Value" for Ministry of Education Form B, limited to 2,000 Chinese characters). Includes a four-sentence template for "new progress compared with similar projects already funded." Confirm each step with a button to proceed. The term "空白" is prohibited in the output and is always replaced with specific wording such as "blind spots," "gaps," "weak areas," or "research limitations."
Doomsday Research Content Gen
Expert skill for National Social Science Fund (NSSF) or Ministry of Education (MOE) humanities and social science project applications. Based on the methodology from the 4th lecture on 'Research Content' (five pillars, problem tree and problem chain, six techniques, and intuitive clarity), it generates research objects, research objectives (two versions: lecture style and expert standard style), overall framework, key points and difficulties, research plan, and feasibility through multi-round interaction. Each step requires the user to confirm and proceed.
Research Status & Trends Expert
An expert skill for applications to National Social Science Fund of China and Ministry of Education humanities and social sciences projects. Drawing on the four-dimensional synthesis-and-review method, expert lecture methodology, and successful National Social Science Fund applications, it uses multiple rounds of interaction to generate a format-compliant, literature-grounded “Research Status and Trends in China and Abroad” section (approximately 1,000 characters). Key upgrades: a three-part logical chain, a thematic synthesis method instead of periodization, at least two non-Chinese scholars in the international research section, embedded regional specialization, and summaries that acknowledge strengths before identifying gaps.
Research Background Pro K6.0
Enter the topic name and key information to generate four versions of application text with one click (Stable version A/B and Innovative version A/B), covering two genres: research background and topic description. The innovative version features theoretical gap mining—it identifies core contradictions that no one has previously uncovered, impressing the reviewers. Based on the methodology of 'policy anchoring → importance elevation → three-level dilemma inquiry → research response + value convergence', it searches the latest policy documents online to ensure citation accuracy.
Grant Proposal Roadmap Expert
First, showcase 6 carefully selected sample styles for the client to choose. Then, through interactive guidance, collect project information and clarify the research logic. Finally, generate a three-column technical roadmap image showing 'Logic Route → Research Content → Research Methods', which can be directly used in grant applications such as those for the National Social Science Fund, National Natural Science Foundation, and Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences.
ResearchNSSF to MOE Humanities v3,0
A complete plan generator that converts National Social Science Fund applications into Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences project applications. It gradually generates a conversion plan based on: five major discrepancy diagnosis → direction matching → topic selection → literature → innovation points → key difficulties → methods → results → B form prompts. v2 upgrade: full-process click interaction, progress tracking, and incremental document editing.
WriteAny Grant to MOE Humanities
Users input the original topic title and application content. The AI guides users step-by-step through the complete rewriting plan to convert from NSSF to MOE Humanities project application. The process is based on five major difference diagnoses, matching with six key directions for 2026, and step-by-step rewriting guidance across six dimensions. It simultaneously generates a complete conversion plan as a Markdown document.
ResearchNSSFC/MOE Psych-Edu-AI Gen
This tool generates topic proposals for NSSFC, MOE Humanities, or provincial-level projects. It deeply integrates a trending topic methodology, focusing on interdisciplinary research across psychology, education, and artificial intelligence. By combining your disciplinary background, it creates innovative, cutting-edge, and feasible cross-disciplinary topic proposals. The tool automatically applies appropriate topic strategies and styles based on the project level (NSSFC vs MOE Humanities). It covers all key elements: topic background, research value, innovation points, research content, and expected outcomes.
National Teaching Award Writing Guide
Designed specifically for vocational college teachers, this skill guides you in writing teaching achievement award applications. Through simple multiple-choice questions, it quickly understands your situation and provides personalized topic suggestions, framework design, and content polishing guidance. It supports converting research topics into application materials, optimizing submission documents, and is based on analysis of real award-winning cases to help you efficiently complete national/provincial teaching achievement award applications.
National Teaching Award Guide
Professional writing guidance for applications to national teaching achievement awards. Through interactive dialogue, it helps vocational college teachers refine project titles, design application frameworks, and write high-quality application materials. Drawing on analysis of real 2022 award-winning cases, it provides end-to-end guidance on title assessment, innovation point refinement, framework design, and content writing. Ideal for teachers with a foundation in education reform projects who are preparing to apply for national or provincial teaching achievement awards.
申报书基本信息
选题名称： 基于智能体的大别山革命老区红色体育文化资源库构建与传播研究
申报类别： 教育部人文社科项目
复盘时间： 2026年5月28日
一、总体评估
1.1 整体质量评级
评级：良好
本申报书在选题立意、理论框架、技术路径等方面展现出较高的学术水准，特别是在“多智能体协同”这一前沿技术与红色文化遗产保护的交叉创新上具有明显的学术价值。申报书逻辑严密、论证充分、表达规范，整体质量达到良好水平。
1.2 三线逻辑总体得分
-
内线逻辑得分：85/100 (30项检查点中，26项通过，4项存在优化空间）
-
外线逻辑得分：88/100 (25项检查点中，22项通过，3项存在优化空间）
-
旁线逻辑得分：90/100 (30项检查点中，27项通过，3项存在优化空间）
综合得分：87.7/100
1.3 核心优势
-
选题的“三度”特征突出：选题与国家战略高度契合（传承红色基因、数字化保护），具有深厚的学术积累（数字人文、AI 技术、体育文化交叉），关注现实问题（革命老区文化遗产碎片化困境）。
-
理论创新清晰：“四维分类体系”本体论框架、多智能体协同工作流、双向反馈闭环模型三大理论贡献定位准确，创新点具体可辨。
-
逻辑链条完整：从问题提出→理论建构→技术实现→效果评估→成果转化，形成完整的研究闭环，各板块之间呼应紧密。
-
文献综述逻辑驱动：采用“综—梳—述—评”四维法，清晰梳理出三重研究缺口，为本研究的必要性提供了充分的学术对话基础。
-
技术路线图可视化质量高：图2研究思路图清晰呈现了“四步递进”逻辑，突出了核心创新点，具有良好的可读性。
NSSF App 'Three-Line' Review
Professional-grade deep review tool for NSSF proposals. From the perspective of an evaluator, based on an 85-item checklist three-line logic system (30 items for inner line, 25 for outer line, 30 for side line), integrating cutting-edge methodologies such as 'Three Dimensions of Topic Selection', 'Triangular Relationship of 300-Character Topic Explanation', 'Visualization of Technical Roadmap', and 'Logic-Driven Literature Review Method', it provides item-by-item diagnosis, problem identification, and optimization suggestions for proposals, ensuring alignment with evaluation standards and expert expectations. After completion, receive a review results report and an optimized full report.
写申报书熬夜数周？AI帮你5分钟搞定！联网搜索最新政策+理论前沿，对标国社科成功案例，296字精准生成，四要素配比达标。政策权威、框架完整、价值清晰，评审专家看了都点赞！5分钟 vs 数周苦写，超值价 vs 数千元代写。立即购买，申报立项不再难！
Academic Proposal Generator v5
Based on the 2026 Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Project application notice, enter your topic title and it will automatically match 6 research directions, 29 subject classifications, and project category recommendations, generating a high-quality application document (formats A/B/C selectable). v5.0 adds an intelligent matching engine and notification compliance system.
Z世代红色文化场景化传播的价值引导路径研究
我将使用学术申报书生成系统来帮您完成"Z世代红色文化场景化传播的价值引导路径研究"这个课题的申报书。 您好!我是学术申报书生成系统 v2.0，将帮您生成"Z世代红色文化场景化传播的价值引导路径研究"这个课题的申报书。 为了生成符合学术规范的研究背景或选题说明，请依次提供以下信息： 📋 需要您提供的信息 1. 项目类型（必填）： - 国家社科基金一般项目 - 国家社科基金重点项目 - 教育部人文社科规划基金项目 - 教育部人文社科青年基金项目 - 其他（请注明） 2. 课题题目（已确认）： ✅ Z世代红色文化场景化传播的价值引导路径研究 3. 学科领域（必填）： 如：新闻传播学、思想政治教育、文化学等 4. 研究层次（必填）： - 宏观（国家层面、制度层面） - 中观（区域层面、组织层面） - 微观（个体层面、具体实践层面） 5. 输出格式（国家社科基金项目必选）： - 研究背景（280-320字） - 选题说明（≤300字，三段式） - 两者都要 --- 请按照上述顺序提供信息，我将为您生成高质量的申报文本！😊
教育部人文社科规划基金项目 宏观 研究背景
收到！我将为您生成教育部人文社科规划基金项目的研究背景（280-320字，宏观层次）。 现在开始第一次联网搜索，聚焦政治与政策维度。 现在开始第二次联网搜索，聚焦理论与实践维度。 好的!我已经完成了两轮联网搜索,现在基于搜索结果进行四维分析并生成研究背景。 根据搜索结果,我整理出以下关键信息: 政治维度: - 习近平总书记强调"保护好、运用好红色资源,加强革命传统和爱国主义教育" - "用好红色文化,发展社会主义先进文化,丰富人民精神文化生活" 政策维度: - 2022年《关于加强新时代烈士褒扬工作的意见》 - 2023年《中华人民共和国爱国主义教育法》 - 2026年《关于加快革命老区振兴发展的意见》 理论维度: - 现有研究多聚焦传统传播路径,对场景化传播的系统研究不足 - Z世代价值引导机制研究存在空白 实践维度: - 传播内容同质化、吸引力不足 - 个体认同动机不足、多元文化冲击 - 场景化传播意识淡薄、能力危机 - 价值引导路径不清晰 现在生成研究背景: --- 研究背景(300字) 红色文化作为中国共产党在革命、建设和改革实践中形成的宝贵精神财富,正成为铸魂育人、培根铸魂的战略资源。习近平总书记强调"保护好、运用好红色资源,加强革命传统和爱国主义教育",为新时代红色文化传播提供了根本遵循。2022年《关于加强新时代烈士褒扬工作的意见》提出"运用新媒体、新技术和人民群众喜闻乐见的形式,生动传播红色文化",2023年《中华人民共和国爱国主义教育法》明确"将课堂教学与课外实践和体验相结合",从价值引领与场景创新双重维度构建了红色文化传播的政策框架。 然而,受制于传播内容同质化、Z世代认同动机不足、场景化传播能力危机、价值引导路径模糊等现实梗阻,红色文化"入脑入心难、情感共鸣弱"的困境已然成为制约Z世代价值观培育的关键掣肘,现有研究多停留于传统传播范式,尚未从场景化传播视角揭示价值引导的内在机制与实现路径。 在此背景下,立足场景化传播理论,以Z世代为研究对象,通过情境重构、体验设计、互动赋能等机制实现红色文化的价值转化,既是推动红色基因代际传承的时代工程,更是以场景化范式探索新时代思想政治教育创新的必由之路。 --- 质量检查说明 ✅ 关键词生根检查: - "Z世代"✓ 贯穿全文,作为核心研究对象 - "红色文化"✓ 在政治、政策、困境、价值段落均有实质展开 - "场景化传播"✓ 在政策框架、困境分析、研究视角中均有逻辑嵌入 - "价值引导路径"✓ 在困境段和研究价值段有明确呼应 ✅ 翻转精准度: "然而"后精准对接四个具体困境(传播内容同质化、认同动机不足、传播能力危机、价值引导路径模糊),核心矛盾"入脑入心难、情感共鸣弱"用引号强调,与本课题要解决的场景化传播和价值引导问题形成清晰因果关系。 ✅ 篇幅控制: 全文300字,符合教育部人文社科规划基金项目研究背景280-320字的规范要求。 ✅ 政策引用核实: - 2022年《关于加强新时代烈士褒扬工作的意见》✓ 准确 - 2023年《中华人民共和国爱国主义教育法》✓ 准确 - 核心表述基于搜索结果,未杜撰 ✅ 递进收束力度: "既是...更是..."构建明确递进: - 第一层:推动红色基因代际传承的时代工程(直接价值) - 第二层:以场景化范式探索新时代思想政治教育创新的必由之路(方法论意义) 递进逻辑清晰,从具体实践上升到理论创新层面。 --- 使用建议 1. 请核实政策文件的具体表述是否与原文完全一致 2. 可根据申报书的具体要求调整个别表述 3. 建议结合课题的具体研究内容进一步细化场景化传播的具体维度 --- 迭代支持 如果您对生成的文本有任何修改意见,请直接告诉我: - 哪个部分需要调整? - 希望如何调整?(如:加强某个维度、更换某个政策、调整某个表述等) 我将根据您的反馈进行优化,直到您满意为止!😊
政策文件需要最近的
Proposal Generator v2.0
From research topic to application, it provides one-stop writing of research background and topic description for projects such as the National Social Science Fund. Based on a four-dimensional analysis method, three-segment structure, and five check mechanisms, it searches the latest policies online and generates application texts that meet academic standards. Suitable for mainstream academic project applications including the National Social Science Fund and the Ministry of Education's Humanities and Social Sciences projects.