Research Value Red Team
Description
An expert skill for the research value section of National Social Science Fund and Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences applications—the Topic Collision Radar edition. Built on Lecture 8, Lecture 64, a case library of five winning proposal templates, and a knowledge base of 535 funded-project lists, it provides: topic-collision radar searches across three comparison levels (National Social Science Fund → Ministry of Education → provincial philosophy and social sciences), with project status labels → six-dimensional difference analysis and collision warnings → T1–T5 academic value formulas and A1–A4 applied value formulas → format-adaptive output ("Academic Value + Applied Value" for the National Social Science Fund application’s free-form section / "Theoretical Value + Practical Application Value" for Ministry of Education Form B, limited to 2,000 Chinese characters). Includes a four-sentence template for "new progress compared with similar projects already funded." Confirm each step with a button to proceed. The term "空白" is prohibited in the output and is always replaced with specific wording such as "blind spots," "gaps," "weak areas," or "research limitations."
Related Skills
View all
Doomsday Innovation Expert
An expert skill for writing the “Innovations” section of applications to the National Social Science Fund of China and the Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences programs. Based on the Lecture 8 methodology and the 2024 revised application-form standards, it covers two major categories: academic viewpoints and research methods. Academic viewpoint innovations follow three models: theoretical integration, contextual modification, and problem reframing. Methodological innovations follow three paths: data sources, analytical tools, and interdisciplinary integration. It uses a “viewpoint statement + brief explanation” writing technique, with button confirmation at each step before proceeding.
Doomsday Research Content Gen
Expert skill for National Social Science Fund (NSSF) or Ministry of Education (MOE) humanities and social science project applications. Based on the methodology from the 4th lecture on 'Research Content' (five pillars, problem tree and problem chain, six techniques, and intuitive clarity), it generates research objects, research objectives (two versions: lecture style and expert standard style), overall framework, key points and difficulties, research plan, and feasibility through multi-round interaction. Each step requires the user to confirm and proceed.
Research Status & Trends Expert
An expert skill for applications to National Social Science Fund of China and Ministry of Education humanities and social sciences projects. Drawing on the four-dimensional synthesis-and-review method, expert lecture methodology, and successful National Social Science Fund applications, it uses multiple rounds of interaction to generate a format-compliant, literature-grounded “Research Status and Trends in China and Abroad” section (approximately 1,000 characters). Key upgrades: a three-part logical chain, a thematic synthesis method instead of periodization, at least two non-Chinese scholars in the international research section, embedded regional specialization, and summaries that acknowledge strengths before identifying gaps.
Research Value Red Team
Description
An expert skill for the research value section of National Social Science Fund and Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences applications—the Topic Collision Radar edition. Built on Lecture 8, Lecture 64, a case library of five winning proposal templates, and a knowledge base of 535 funded-project lists, it provides: topic-collision radar searches across three comparison levels (National Social Science Fund → Ministry of Education → provincial philosophy and social sciences), with project status labels → six-dimensional difference analysis and collision warnings → T1–T5 academic value formulas and A1–A4 applied value formulas → format-adaptive output ("Academic Value + Applied Value" for the National Social Science Fund application’s free-form section / "Theoretical Value + Practical Application Value" for Ministry of Education Form B, limited to 2,000 Chinese characters). Includes a four-sentence template for "new progress compared with similar projects already funded." Confirm each step with a button to proceed. The term "空白" is prohibited in the output and is always replaced with specific wording such as "blind spots," "gaps," "weak areas," or "research limitations."
Related Skills
View allDoomsday Innovation Expert
An expert skill for writing the “Innovations” section of applications to the National Social Science Fund of China and the Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences programs. Based on the Lecture 8 methodology and the 2024 revised application-form standards, it covers two major categories: academic viewpoints and research methods. Academic viewpoint innovations follow three models: theoretical integration, contextual modification, and problem reframing. Methodological innovations follow three paths: data sources, analytical tools, and interdisciplinary integration. It uses a “viewpoint statement + brief explanation” writing technique, with button confirmation at each step before proceeding.
Doomsday Research Content Gen
Expert skill for National Social Science Fund (NSSF) or Ministry of Education (MOE) humanities and social science project applications. Based on the methodology from the 4th lecture on 'Research Content' (five pillars, problem tree and problem chain, six techniques, and intuitive clarity), it generates research objects, research objectives (two versions: lecture style and expert standard style), overall framework, key points and difficulties, research plan, and feasibility through multi-round interaction. Each step requires the user to confirm and proceed.
Research Status & Trends Expert
An expert skill for applications to National Social Science Fund of China and Ministry of Education humanities and social sciences projects. Drawing on the four-dimensional synthesis-and-review method, expert lecture methodology, and successful National Social Science Fund applications, it uses multiple rounds of interaction to generate a format-compliant, literature-grounded “Research Status and Trends in China and Abroad” section (approximately 1,000 characters). Key upgrades: a three-part logical chain, a thematic synthesis method instead of periodization, at least two non-Chinese scholars in the international research section, embedded regional specialization, and summaries that acknowledge strengths before identifying gaps.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.