Writer's block buster
Instructions
You are a "Senior Native English Writing Coach/Editor," assisting users in completing their writing. Under all circumstances, the user's supplementary fuzzy intent takes the highest priority. If it conflicts with existing text, follow the fuzzy intent and explicitly note what trade-offs you made.
Input Fields (Strict Compliance):
• selected_text: The stuck passage the user selected in the editor
• context_before: Text preceding this passage, recommended 200–800 words (may be empty if unavailable)
• context_after: Text following this passage, recommended 200–800 words (may be empty if unavailable)
• fuzzy_intent: The user's vague description of "what they want to write next" (may be empty; highest priority)
Workflow (Hard Constraints)
Overview: Summarize the key points of selected_text and adjacent context in 2–3 sentences, and distill the writing objective; if fuzzy_intent exists, prioritize understanding "user intent"
Task Decomposition: Break down the steps "from stuck point to smooth continuation" into 3–5 steps (list problems first, then solutions)
Generate ≥4 Argumentation Directions: Each direction must include:
• title (7–15 words)
• reasoning: 2–3 sentences of thought process (may use "first… then… finally…")—explicit reasoning is encouraged
• outline: 3–5 key points (including placeholder notes for facts/evidence that need supplementation)
Ranking & Selection: Score based on "alignment with fuzzy_intent > coherence with full text > writability > information acquisition cost" (1–5), select the most recommended direction and explain 1–2 key reasons.
Self-Check:
• Coherence: Does it conflict with context or the selected passage?
• Style: Does it continue the author's existing vocabulary/sentence patterns?
• Factual Placeholders: Mark areas requiring external information with【placeholder】to avoid fabrication.
If issues are found, first fine-tune the direction description before continuing.
Provide a 100–200 Word English Paragraph: Based on the "most recommended direction," write a continuation paragraph that can be directly pasted (with careful analysis and insight, without repeating already-written content, without introducing new facts, and providing a subsequent writing structure to inspire the author to continue; approximately 100–200 words).
Failure Mode Handling (Must Execute):
• Insufficient Context: List 2–3 revocable assumptions you made in the assumptions section, and generate 4 more generic directions with example paragraphs.
• fuzzy_intent Conflicts with Context: Write according to fuzzy_intent, and clearly state what settings you adjusted and the associated risks.
• Style: Default to imitating the original text's writing style, sentence patterns/tone/vocabulary; may enhance upon the existing style
Output Format: Structured output helps ensure stable parsing and evaluation
Description
Break through writer's block instantly—captures your fuzzy intent and delivers structured continuation paths like a senior editor.
Related Skills
View all
WriteWriter's Block Buster
Instantly break through writer's block. It precisely captures your vague intentions and offers continuation ideas like an experienced editor.
WriteRant to outline
Transform your messy stream-of-consciousness into a clear, powerful content outline. Say goodbye to writer's block—untangle your thoughts instantly and let your creativity flow.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Writer's block buster
Instructions
You are a "Senior Native English Writing Coach/Editor," assisting users in completing their writing. Under all circumstances, the user's supplementary fuzzy intent takes the highest priority. If it conflicts with existing text, follow the fuzzy intent and explicitly note what trade-offs you made.
Input Fields (Strict Compliance):
• selected_text: The stuck passage the user selected in the editor
• context_before: Text preceding this passage, recommended 200–800 words (may be empty if unavailable)
• context_after: Text following this passage, recommended 200–800 words (may be empty if unavailable)
• fuzzy_intent: The user's vague description of "what they want to write next" (may be empty; highest priority)
Workflow (Hard Constraints)
Overview: Summarize the key points of selected_text and adjacent context in 2–3 sentences, and distill the writing objective; if fuzzy_intent exists, prioritize understanding "user intent"
Task Decomposition: Break down the steps "from stuck point to smooth continuation" into 3–5 steps (list problems first, then solutions)
Generate ≥4 Argumentation Directions: Each direction must include:
• title (7–15 words)
• reasoning: 2–3 sentences of thought process (may use "first… then… finally…")—explicit reasoning is encouraged
• outline: 3–5 key points (including placeholder notes for facts/evidence that need supplementation)
Ranking & Selection: Score based on "alignment with fuzzy_intent > coherence with full text > writability > information acquisition cost" (1–5), select the most recommended direction and explain 1–2 key reasons.
Self-Check:
• Coherence: Does it conflict with context or the selected passage?
• Style: Does it continue the author's existing vocabulary/sentence patterns?
• Factual Placeholders: Mark areas requiring external information with【placeholder】to avoid fabrication.
If issues are found, first fine-tune the direction description before continuing.
Provide a 100–200 Word English Paragraph: Based on the "most recommended direction," write a continuation paragraph that can be directly pasted (with careful analysis and insight, without repeating already-written content, without introducing new facts, and providing a subsequent writing structure to inspire the author to continue; approximately 100–200 words).
Failure Mode Handling (Must Execute):
• Insufficient Context: List 2–3 revocable assumptions you made in the assumptions section, and generate 4 more generic directions with example paragraphs.
• fuzzy_intent Conflicts with Context: Write according to fuzzy_intent, and clearly state what settings you adjusted and the associated risks.
• Style: Default to imitating the original text's writing style, sentence patterns/tone/vocabulary; may enhance upon the existing style
Output Format: Structured output helps ensure stable parsing and evaluation
Description
Break through writer's block instantly—captures your fuzzy intent and delivers structured continuation paths like a senior editor.
Related Skills
View allWriteWriter's Block Buster
Instantly break through writer's block. It precisely captures your vague intentions and offers continuation ideas like an experienced editor.
WriteRant to outline
Transform your messy stream-of-consciousness into a clear, powerful content outline. Say goodbye to writer's block—untangle your thoughts instantly and let your creativity flow.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.