Description

Stuck on your e-commerce undergraduate thesis? Does your current status section read like a company intro? Is your strategy section just the classic "strengthen promotion, improve service" four-piece set? Did you only realize two weeks before your defense that your title doesn't match your content? This skill is a revision workbench designed for e-commerce undergraduates. Its 13 commands help you check: whether the title is correct, whether the framework holds up, whether the paragraph arguments have loopholes, whether sentences are smooth, whether the same indicator has inconsistent definitions across chapters, why the defense teacher asks a certain question, and where follow-up questions might come from. In a word: AI won't write your thesis for you, but it helps you see where the problems are, how to fix them, and what to do next. What it cares about most: It will not fabricate data for you, will not write company facts for you, and will not write entire paragraphs of text for you. All revision suggestions leave a placeholder like 【Please replace with your real data】 so that you fill in with the authentic materials you collected yourself—so the thesis you submit is yours, not AI's. When checking sentence by sentence, each sentence's issues are categorized into two types: 【Structural issues】 that need content addition or rewriting, and 【Language issues】 that are suitable for polishing—so you won't use smooth wording to mask empty content, and you can clearly see which sentences are truly revised after editing. Coverage: mainstream e-commerce directions such as online marketing, store operations, short videos, live streaming sales, cross-border, private domains, agricultural product e-commerce, and more. From first draft self-check, chapter-by-chapter proofreading, version comparison to defense preparation, multiple rounds of follow-up. 【For advisors】 Teachers supervising e-commerce undergraduate theses can also use it this way: have students first run /check to diagnose the four layers of issues—framework, evidence, paragraphs, sentences—and then come for a meeting with the diagnostic report. This way, your grading time can focus more on judgment and direction rather than reading through everything to find problems. The /compare command can also directly compare the student's first draft and second draft to see if the revisions are adequate. Not suitable for: master's/doctoral theses, journal submissions, or non-e-commerce undergraduate theses. v2.2.1 early version. Feedback from students and advisors is welcome to help us make this revision workbench even smoother.