One-Click Rubric v3.0
5 questions → a usable rubric in 10 min
Description
Generate a ready-to-use rubric in one click. 🎯 Automatic adaptation across 6 subject areas — Teacher education / healthcare / STEM / arts / business and management / humanities. Enter what you’re assessing, and the skill automatically matches specialized criteria—no need to design the framework manually. 🔴 Built-in audit check, zero vague wording — Vague phrases like “good,” “average,” and “basic” are automatically identified and rewritten. Every performance level includes observable behavioral anchors. 🔁 Fully visible and editable — Confirm the criteria list first, then generate the rubric. Adjustment options are available at every step, and you can start over anytime. 🎁 Extra resources included — Automatically receive a student self-checklist and a peer review language template. One rubric, three ready-to-use tools. ♥ Assessment shouldn’t be a burden for teachers. It should be a compass for student growth. Let AI handle the tedious formatting and logic so you can focus on what truly matters—understanding students, designing instruction, and supporting their growth. v3.0 · Refined through 3 rounds of iteration · Designed for process-based assessment / project assignments / national competitions / peer review 💰 About the price of a cup of milk tea. Consider it a friendly introduction—if you find it, you’ve already come out ahead.
Related Skills
View all
Course Design Assistant v7.0
💡 What can this assistant do for you? An expert with years of experience in instructional design and lesson plan writing, guiding you step by step to create professional-level instructional designs. (Offline training valued at least ¥3000 per session.) 📋 13-step standardized process, scientific and rigorous, no omissions From course information collection → learning situation analysis → pain point diagnosis → key/difficult point confirmation → objective writing (draft + refinement) → teaching model selection → AI tool integration → process design → evaluation design → board design → complete plan → multi-format delivery Each step includes quality checks to ensure no skipped steps, no omissions, and no vague content. 🎯 Automatic ABCD principle check, no more headaches in objective writing The system automatically checks each objective against the ABCD principle and tags Bloom's taxonomy levels (L1-L6). 📊 Dedicated "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" check, aligned with first-class course standards No more worrying about reviewers saying "insufficient challenge." The system quantifies the check for you. 🧠 Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching, automatically achieving higher-order thinking The system includes a Bloom's verb classification table (L1-L6) and automatically identifies: Each objective is automatically tagged with its level, ensuring the proportion of higher-order objectives meets standards. 🎨 Natural integration of curriculum-based ideological and political education, no more forced labeling The system provides 5 integration strategies: - Situational embedding: Introduce through real cases/historical stories (e.g., "China's high-speed rail control system from import to independent innovation") - Behavioral concretization: Replace abstract concepts with observable behaviors (e.g., "Identify violations in engineering accidents" rather than "Improve professional ethics") - Value conflict: Set ethical dilemmas to guide judgment (e.g., "Economic benefits vs. environmental protection") - Cultural inheritance: Introduce through traditional culture/institutional advantages (e.g., "The artisan spirit of ancient astronomical instruments") - Comprehensive literacy goals: Covering scientific literacy, engineering literacy, innovation literacy, digital literacy, values, humanistic literacy, and global perspective ⏱️ Time-driven design to ensure the teaching process is implementable Automatically calculate the total time for each segment Compare with the total time set by the user If the error exceeds ±5 minutes, automatically alert and provide adjustment suggestions No more awkward situations where "the design looks great but there isn't enough class time" 🤖 Deep integration of AI tools, supporting higher-order thinking rather than just efficiency improvement Three-tier architecture: - L1 Tool layer: Visualization, real-time feedback, virtual simulation - L2 Teaching layer: Personalized paths, layered tasks, collaborative support - L3 Innovation layer: AI as debate opponent, decision simulation, design assistance Only recommends domestic AI tools (Wenxin Yiyan, Tongyi Qianwen, Doubao, etc.), supports integration of teacher-built intelligent agents 📐 Comprehensive evaluation design, perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment - Diagnostic evaluation: Pre-class assessment - Formative evaluation: Process monitoring (classroom questioning, group discussion, lab reports) - Summative evaluation: Outcome validation (exams, project presentations) For L4-L6 higher-order objectives, automatically generate evaluation rubrics including four dimensions: "Depth of analysis, Innovation, Argument quality, Critical thinking" 🎭 Two working modes to suit different needs - Mode A (Quick output): Provide basic information → System automatically completes steps 2-11 → Outputs complete plan directly → Suitable for time-constrained users who trust AI judgment - Mode B (Step-by-step interaction): Gradually confirm each step → User can modify at any time → Suitable for fine-tuning and deep involvement Regardless of mode, 4 delivery formats are available: Detailed version, concise version, visual web page, teaching process framework diagram ⚡ Six core competitive advantages (unique features) 🔬 1. Scientific process, not based on intuition 13-step standardized process strictly executed in order, no skipping. Each step has clear output and quality check to ensure the design aligns with educational principles. 📊 2. Quantitative check of "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" Automatically detect advancedity (proportion of higher-order objectives ≥50%), innovation (real situations + innovative modes), and challenge (open-ended questions + interdisciplinary integration), aligned with first-class course standards. 🎯 3. Automatic ABCD principle verification Each objective must include "Condition-Behavior-Standard," with observable and measurable action verbs. The system automatically checks and tags Bloom's levels. 🧠 4. Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching Built-in L1-L6 verb classification table, automatically identifies objective levels, ensures higher-order thinking standards are met, no more worrying about reviewers saying "objective level is too low." ⏱️ 5. Time-driven design Automatically calculate segment durations, compare with total duration, alert if error exceeds ±5 minutes, ensuring the teaching design is implementable and within time limits. 📐 6. Perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment Constructive Alignment principle ensures consistency among "teaching objectives, teaching activities, and assessment methods." Each objective has corresponding activities and evaluations. 🎯 Applicable scenarios (covering all higher education) ✅ Teaching competitions: Teaching innovation competitions, young teacher teaching competitions, classroom teaching contests ✅ Course construction: First-class course applications, curriculum-based ideological and political demonstration courses, blended course design ✅ Daily teaching: New lesson preparation, teaching reform, teaching model innovation ✅ Teaching evaluation: Peer review, supervisory observation, teaching quality assessment ✅ Teacher development: New teacher training, teaching ability enhancement, teaching research 🚀 User experience Quick mode (Mode A): Provide course name, chapter, major, class hours → Select Mode A → System automatically completes 13-step process → Get complete teaching design in 30 minutes → Choose delivery format (detailed/concise/visual web page/framework diagram) Detailed mode (Mode B): Provide basic information → Select Mode B → Gradually confirm learning situation analysis, pain point diagnosis, key/difficult points, teaching objectives, teaching model, AI tools, teaching process, evaluation design, board design → Modify at each step → Complete high-quality teaching design in 1-2 hours Review mode: Upload existing teaching design → System evaluates step by step against all elements → Summarize three strengths and three weaknesses → Provide specific and actionable optimization suggestions → Generate a standardized and well-formatted evaluation report document
HE Document Write&Review v3.0
🎯 Got your application rejected? Can't find the highlight for your proposal? Don't know where to start with review comments? Three real scenarios: 🔸 Scenario 1: Application season anxiety—Reviewer feedback: "Insufficient theoretical support, vague policy basis." Unsure which documents to cite or which theoretical framework to use. 🔸 Scenario 2: Proposal writing dilemma—In charge of course construction plan: objectives, tasks, pathways, evaluation… each part needs writing, but you feel the logic is not rigorous enough and worry about being questioned on "feasibility" during review. 🔸 Scenario 3: Review dilemma—Need to write peer review comments: must point out issues while maintaining professionalism, be well-founded but not too harsh. How to strike the balance? 💡 What can this system do for you? Not just give advice—it writes, revises, and reviews for you directly. 📝 Writing Mode: From topic to final document Enter your topic and existing materials. The system automatically identifies the document type (application/proposal/report/review). Automatically matches authoritative policy documents and theoretical support. Generates content chapter by chapter, each with evidence, logic, and facts. Key promise: Never fabricates data; clearly tells you what's missing. 🔍 Review Mode: Expert-level diagnosis Upload your text. Professional scoring across 7 dimensions (value, alignment, completeness, innovation, feasibility, support, expression quality). Precisely identifies problem areas. Provides specific revision suggestions + example rewrites. Not general advice, but paragraph-level specific guidance. ✏️ Revision Optimization Mode: Precision enhancement Strengthens arguments based on existing text. Optimizes expression, eliminates empty talk and clichés. Standardizes terminology and logic. Improves overall competitiveness. ⚡ Three Core Mechanisms (Unique) 🛡️ Firewall Mechanism Built-in "fact boundary": User-provided real data is never fabricated; policy basis must have sources; theoretical support cannot be misapplied. Every sentence you see can be traced back to its source. 🔄 Multi-core Adversarial Engine One core writes, another specifically checks for errors. Like having a strict auditor watching, ensuring no "unsubstantiated facts," "logic gaps," or "policy mismatches" occur. 📊 Stepwise Guidance Doesn't ask you 20 questions at once—identifies the most critical gaps and asks only the 3–5 most necessary questions. After each stage, clearly tells you "what's done," "what's missing," and "what to do next." 🎯 Scope of Application (All Higher Education Scenarios) ✅ Teaching achievement award applications (institutional/provincial/national) ✅ Quality engineering project applications (top courses/teaching teams/textbooks, etc.) ✅ Course construction plans, major construction plans ✅ Major self-assessment reports, course acceptance reports ✅ Expert review comments, peer reviews ✅ Education reform project applications, closing reports 🚀 User Experience Writing an application from scratch: Provide the topic and basic materials → System identifies document type, takes inventory, matches policies and theories → Generates outline → Writes chapter by chapter → Consolidates → Get a draft in 1 hour. Reviewing existing text: Upload document → System automatically scores → Lists main issues → Provides revision suggestions and example rewrites → Get review report in 20 minutes. Optimizing existing plan: Provide existing text and optimization direction → System diagnoses weaknesses → Strengthens arguments, optimizes expression → Get optimized version in 30 minutes. 👉 Try it now—make higher education document writing no longer a burden. This is not just a writing assistant; it's an intelligent engine that understands higher education rules, review standards, and professional expression.
ResearchFlagship 3-Step Lesson Planner
🔥【Back-to-School Limited-Time Offer】1,599 points from August 27 to September 5 (regularly 1,999)! Start the new semester with a contest-ready lesson-prep package. 【Generate Five Lesson-Prep Essentials at Once】 🖥 PPT (polished contest version / lightweight everyday version) · 📝 Word-for-word teaching script and lesson plan (with complete teacher prompts—just follow along) · 🎯 Activity design · Board work · In-class practice exercises 【Why “Contest-Level” Quality?】 This Skill includes a library of teaching-design patterns from top-quality and model lessons nationwide, covering mainstream contest approaches such as contextual introductions, task-based learning, question chains, and flipped classrooms. It also incorporates professional frameworks including Bloom’s taxonomy, the ADDIE model, and Understanding by Design (UbD). Every lesson is checked against these methodologies rather than being a simple pileup of content. 【Flagship Edition Upgrades】—Designed with high-quality lessons in mind ✨ Hybrid questionnaire: Select options and enter details freely to complete information collection in 30 seconds ✨ Parameter lock: Course information and PPT style are locked in the first step, with no drift in later generation ✨ Real interactive confirmation: Clickable options for outline confirmation and five-piece selection enable personalized customization ✨ Dual-mode PPT: Smart switching between contest presentation and everyday teaching modes ✨ Closed-loop post-lesson reflection: Questionnaire collection → AI-generated reflection → Board Memory stores your dedicated teaching profile ✨ Controlled costs: Cost expectations are stated before generation; choose between a fully illustrated polished version and a lightweight outline version, with no overproduction or automatic upgrades 【Three-Step Process】 ① Collect information → Two rounds of interactive questionnaires + parameter lock ② Confirm the outline → AI provides the teaching framework first; generation begins after you confirm ③ Visual delivery → Generate the five-piece set all at once: PPT + word-for-word script / contest-standard lesson plan + activity design + board work + practice exercises, with flexible combinations 【Pricing】 1,599 points (back-to-school limited-time offer; regularly 1,999)—the price of a cup of coffee in exchange for freedom from daily lesson-prep stress. · Generate the complete five-piece set in one use · Cut lesson preparation from about 4 hours to about 1 hour · Generate contest lesson plans directly · Teach everyday classes with ready-to-use materials · Iterated through use by 45 teachers, saving more than 200 hours of lesson-prep time in total 💡 Suitable for: All grade levels from kindergarten through university, and all subjects including language arts, math, English, physics, chemistry, biology, history, geography, civics, arts, and physical education. Suitable for everyday teaching, contest presentations, and open classes. ⚠️ Review and revise AI-generated content based on your textbook edition, school requirements, and students’ actual learning needs. Teachers’ professional judgment should have the final say. 📩 Feedback and suggestions: 593975647@qq.com. Feedback comes with a little surprise 🎁~
One-Click Rubric v3.0
5 questions → a usable rubric in 10 min
Description
Generate a ready-to-use rubric in one click. 🎯 Automatic adaptation across 6 subject areas — Teacher education / healthcare / STEM / arts / business and management / humanities. Enter what you’re assessing, and the skill automatically matches specialized criteria—no need to design the framework manually. 🔴 Built-in audit check, zero vague wording — Vague phrases like “good,” “average,” and “basic” are automatically identified and rewritten. Every performance level includes observable behavioral anchors. 🔁 Fully visible and editable — Confirm the criteria list first, then generate the rubric. Adjustment options are available at every step, and you can start over anytime. 🎁 Extra resources included — Automatically receive a student self-checklist and a peer review language template. One rubric, three ready-to-use tools. ♥ Assessment shouldn’t be a burden for teachers. It should be a compass for student growth. Let AI handle the tedious formatting and logic so you can focus on what truly matters—understanding students, designing instruction, and supporting their growth. v3.0 · Refined through 3 rounds of iteration · Designed for process-based assessment / project assignments / national competitions / peer review 💰 About the price of a cup of milk tea. Consider it a friendly introduction—if you find it, you’ve already come out ahead.
Related Skills
View allCourse Design Assistant v7.0
💡 What can this assistant do for you? An expert with years of experience in instructional design and lesson plan writing, guiding you step by step to create professional-level instructional designs. (Offline training valued at least ¥3000 per session.) 📋 13-step standardized process, scientific and rigorous, no omissions From course information collection → learning situation analysis → pain point diagnosis → key/difficult point confirmation → objective writing (draft + refinement) → teaching model selection → AI tool integration → process design → evaluation design → board design → complete plan → multi-format delivery Each step includes quality checks to ensure no skipped steps, no omissions, and no vague content. 🎯 Automatic ABCD principle check, no more headaches in objective writing The system automatically checks each objective against the ABCD principle and tags Bloom's taxonomy levels (L1-L6). 📊 Dedicated "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" check, aligned with first-class course standards No more worrying about reviewers saying "insufficient challenge." The system quantifies the check for you. 🧠 Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching, automatically achieving higher-order thinking The system includes a Bloom's verb classification table (L1-L6) and automatically identifies: Each objective is automatically tagged with its level, ensuring the proportion of higher-order objectives meets standards. 🎨 Natural integration of curriculum-based ideological and political education, no more forced labeling The system provides 5 integration strategies: - Situational embedding: Introduce through real cases/historical stories (e.g., "China's high-speed rail control system from import to independent innovation") - Behavioral concretization: Replace abstract concepts with observable behaviors (e.g., "Identify violations in engineering accidents" rather than "Improve professional ethics") - Value conflict: Set ethical dilemmas to guide judgment (e.g., "Economic benefits vs. environmental protection") - Cultural inheritance: Introduce through traditional culture/institutional advantages (e.g., "The artisan spirit of ancient astronomical instruments") - Comprehensive literacy goals: Covering scientific literacy, engineering literacy, innovation literacy, digital literacy, values, humanistic literacy, and global perspective ⏱️ Time-driven design to ensure the teaching process is implementable Automatically calculate the total time for each segment Compare with the total time set by the user If the error exceeds ±5 minutes, automatically alert and provide adjustment suggestions No more awkward situations where "the design looks great but there isn't enough class time" 🤖 Deep integration of AI tools, supporting higher-order thinking rather than just efficiency improvement Three-tier architecture: - L1 Tool layer: Visualization, real-time feedback, virtual simulation - L2 Teaching layer: Personalized paths, layered tasks, collaborative support - L3 Innovation layer: AI as debate opponent, decision simulation, design assistance Only recommends domestic AI tools (Wenxin Yiyan, Tongyi Qianwen, Doubao, etc.), supports integration of teacher-built intelligent agents 📐 Comprehensive evaluation design, perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment - Diagnostic evaluation: Pre-class assessment - Formative evaluation: Process monitoring (classroom questioning, group discussion, lab reports) - Summative evaluation: Outcome validation (exams, project presentations) For L4-L6 higher-order objectives, automatically generate evaluation rubrics including four dimensions: "Depth of analysis, Innovation, Argument quality, Critical thinking" 🎭 Two working modes to suit different needs - Mode A (Quick output): Provide basic information → System automatically completes steps 2-11 → Outputs complete plan directly → Suitable for time-constrained users who trust AI judgment - Mode B (Step-by-step interaction): Gradually confirm each step → User can modify at any time → Suitable for fine-tuning and deep involvement Regardless of mode, 4 delivery formats are available: Detailed version, concise version, visual web page, teaching process framework diagram ⚡ Six core competitive advantages (unique features) 🔬 1. Scientific process, not based on intuition 13-step standardized process strictly executed in order, no skipping. Each step has clear output and quality check to ensure the design aligns with educational principles. 📊 2. Quantitative check of "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" Automatically detect advancedity (proportion of higher-order objectives ≥50%), innovation (real situations + innovative modes), and challenge (open-ended questions + interdisciplinary integration), aligned with first-class course standards. 🎯 3. Automatic ABCD principle verification Each objective must include "Condition-Behavior-Standard," with observable and measurable action verbs. The system automatically checks and tags Bloom's levels. 🧠 4. Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching Built-in L1-L6 verb classification table, automatically identifies objective levels, ensures higher-order thinking standards are met, no more worrying about reviewers saying "objective level is too low." ⏱️ 5. Time-driven design Automatically calculate segment durations, compare with total duration, alert if error exceeds ±5 minutes, ensuring the teaching design is implementable and within time limits. 📐 6. Perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment Constructive Alignment principle ensures consistency among "teaching objectives, teaching activities, and assessment methods." Each objective has corresponding activities and evaluations. 🎯 Applicable scenarios (covering all higher education) ✅ Teaching competitions: Teaching innovation competitions, young teacher teaching competitions, classroom teaching contests ✅ Course construction: First-class course applications, curriculum-based ideological and political demonstration courses, blended course design ✅ Daily teaching: New lesson preparation, teaching reform, teaching model innovation ✅ Teaching evaluation: Peer review, supervisory observation, teaching quality assessment ✅ Teacher development: New teacher training, teaching ability enhancement, teaching research 🚀 User experience Quick mode (Mode A): Provide course name, chapter, major, class hours → Select Mode A → System automatically completes 13-step process → Get complete teaching design in 30 minutes → Choose delivery format (detailed/concise/visual web page/framework diagram) Detailed mode (Mode B): Provide basic information → Select Mode B → Gradually confirm learning situation analysis, pain point diagnosis, key/difficult points, teaching objectives, teaching model, AI tools, teaching process, evaluation design, board design → Modify at each step → Complete high-quality teaching design in 1-2 hours Review mode: Upload existing teaching design → System evaluates step by step against all elements → Summarize three strengths and three weaknesses → Provide specific and actionable optimization suggestions → Generate a standardized and well-formatted evaluation report document
HE Document Write&Review v3.0
🎯 Got your application rejected? Can't find the highlight for your proposal? Don't know where to start with review comments? Three real scenarios: 🔸 Scenario 1: Application season anxiety—Reviewer feedback: "Insufficient theoretical support, vague policy basis." Unsure which documents to cite or which theoretical framework to use. 🔸 Scenario 2: Proposal writing dilemma—In charge of course construction plan: objectives, tasks, pathways, evaluation… each part needs writing, but you feel the logic is not rigorous enough and worry about being questioned on "feasibility" during review. 🔸 Scenario 3: Review dilemma—Need to write peer review comments: must point out issues while maintaining professionalism, be well-founded but not too harsh. How to strike the balance? 💡 What can this system do for you? Not just give advice—it writes, revises, and reviews for you directly. 📝 Writing Mode: From topic to final document Enter your topic and existing materials. The system automatically identifies the document type (application/proposal/report/review). Automatically matches authoritative policy documents and theoretical support. Generates content chapter by chapter, each with evidence, logic, and facts. Key promise: Never fabricates data; clearly tells you what's missing. 🔍 Review Mode: Expert-level diagnosis Upload your text. Professional scoring across 7 dimensions (value, alignment, completeness, innovation, feasibility, support, expression quality). Precisely identifies problem areas. Provides specific revision suggestions + example rewrites. Not general advice, but paragraph-level specific guidance. ✏️ Revision Optimization Mode: Precision enhancement Strengthens arguments based on existing text. Optimizes expression, eliminates empty talk and clichés. Standardizes terminology and logic. Improves overall competitiveness. ⚡ Three Core Mechanisms (Unique) 🛡️ Firewall Mechanism Built-in "fact boundary": User-provided real data is never fabricated; policy basis must have sources; theoretical support cannot be misapplied. Every sentence you see can be traced back to its source. 🔄 Multi-core Adversarial Engine One core writes, another specifically checks for errors. Like having a strict auditor watching, ensuring no "unsubstantiated facts," "logic gaps," or "policy mismatches" occur. 📊 Stepwise Guidance Doesn't ask you 20 questions at once—identifies the most critical gaps and asks only the 3–5 most necessary questions. After each stage, clearly tells you "what's done," "what's missing," and "what to do next." 🎯 Scope of Application (All Higher Education Scenarios) ✅ Teaching achievement award applications (institutional/provincial/national) ✅ Quality engineering project applications (top courses/teaching teams/textbooks, etc.) ✅ Course construction plans, major construction plans ✅ Major self-assessment reports, course acceptance reports ✅ Expert review comments, peer reviews ✅ Education reform project applications, closing reports 🚀 User Experience Writing an application from scratch: Provide the topic and basic materials → System identifies document type, takes inventory, matches policies and theories → Generates outline → Writes chapter by chapter → Consolidates → Get a draft in 1 hour. Reviewing existing text: Upload document → System automatically scores → Lists main issues → Provides revision suggestions and example rewrites → Get review report in 20 minutes. Optimizing existing plan: Provide existing text and optimization direction → System diagnoses weaknesses → Strengthens arguments, optimizes expression → Get optimized version in 30 minutes. 👉 Try it now—make higher education document writing no longer a burden. This is not just a writing assistant; it's an intelligent engine that understands higher education rules, review standards, and professional expression.
ResearchFlagship 3-Step Lesson Planner
🔥【Back-to-School Limited-Time Offer】1,599 points from August 27 to September 5 (regularly 1,999)! Start the new semester with a contest-ready lesson-prep package. 【Generate Five Lesson-Prep Essentials at Once】 🖥 PPT (polished contest version / lightweight everyday version) · 📝 Word-for-word teaching script and lesson plan (with complete teacher prompts—just follow along) · 🎯 Activity design · Board work · In-class practice exercises 【Why “Contest-Level” Quality?】 This Skill includes a library of teaching-design patterns from top-quality and model lessons nationwide, covering mainstream contest approaches such as contextual introductions, task-based learning, question chains, and flipped classrooms. It also incorporates professional frameworks including Bloom’s taxonomy, the ADDIE model, and Understanding by Design (UbD). Every lesson is checked against these methodologies rather than being a simple pileup of content. 【Flagship Edition Upgrades】—Designed with high-quality lessons in mind ✨ Hybrid questionnaire: Select options and enter details freely to complete information collection in 30 seconds ✨ Parameter lock: Course information and PPT style are locked in the first step, with no drift in later generation ✨ Real interactive confirmation: Clickable options for outline confirmation and five-piece selection enable personalized customization ✨ Dual-mode PPT: Smart switching between contest presentation and everyday teaching modes ✨ Closed-loop post-lesson reflection: Questionnaire collection → AI-generated reflection → Board Memory stores your dedicated teaching profile ✨ Controlled costs: Cost expectations are stated before generation; choose between a fully illustrated polished version and a lightweight outline version, with no overproduction or automatic upgrades 【Three-Step Process】 ① Collect information → Two rounds of interactive questionnaires + parameter lock ② Confirm the outline → AI provides the teaching framework first; generation begins after you confirm ③ Visual delivery → Generate the five-piece set all at once: PPT + word-for-word script / contest-standard lesson plan + activity design + board work + practice exercises, with flexible combinations 【Pricing】 1,599 points (back-to-school limited-time offer; regularly 1,999)—the price of a cup of coffee in exchange for freedom from daily lesson-prep stress. · Generate the complete five-piece set in one use · Cut lesson preparation from about 4 hours to about 1 hour · Generate contest lesson plans directly · Teach everyday classes with ready-to-use materials · Iterated through use by 45 teachers, saving more than 200 hours of lesson-prep time in total 💡 Suitable for: All grade levels from kindergarten through university, and all subjects including language arts, math, English, physics, chemistry, biology, history, geography, civics, arts, and physical education. Suitable for everyday teaching, contest presentations, and open classes. ⚠️ Review and revise AI-generated content based on your textbook edition, school requirements, and students’ actual learning needs. Teachers’ professional judgment should have the final say. 📩 Feedback and suggestions: 593975647@qq.com. Feedback comes with a little surprise 🎁~
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.