Prov. Proposal Assistant V2
Prov. proposal writing in art/design
Description
v0.4 Three-Type Source Imitation Edition | Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (Art/Design) Proposal Writing Assistant. Based on the v0.3 Dual Gate (Protocol 7: project benchmarking + Protocol 8: imitation adaptation), a third source imitation type is added: the awarded proposal writing format template (Protocol 9). Research design follows the methodology source, while the written form follows the awarded proposal template; the two source imitation types are layered and not mixed. Protocol 9 includes template hierarchical routing (same-level templates in this province avoid downgrading, syntax priority; cross-level templates undergo downgrade calibration) and the province's five-column practical fingerprint. Default output is a 5,000-character proposal document, with an additional trigger three-piece set.
Related Skills
View all
Research Proposal Assistant
Tailored for university faculty and researchers, this AI assistant provides comprehensive guidance in writing humanities and social science research proposals, covering the entire process from topic generation to outcome planning. Whether you need to brainstorm a topic from scratch or optimize a specific section of your proposal, this tool offers expert-level guidance and support. This assistant combines expert experience with a strategy of 'example guidance + writing theory integration' to help you efficiently produce high-quality proposals. You receive targeted analysis of research hotspots in your discipline, topic refinement suggestions, and—based on your research direction and project type—generate a rigorous background, in-depth literature review, and insightful research value statement. In the research content design phase, the assistant helps you define the research subject, build a logically clear research framework, and recommend innovative research ideas and methods. It also helps you distill key points and difficulties, set clear research objectives, and plan a detailed research schedule and feasibility analysis, ensuring your proposal is rigorous and well-structured. Additionally, you can use this tool to deeply explore the innovative aspects of your topic in terms of academic ideas, viewpoints, and research methods, and systematically plan multiple forms of expected outcomes, their applications, and social benefits. Finally, all content is integrated with one click to generate a complete, logically rigorous proposal that meets submission standards, helping you increase your success rate.
Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert
📚 Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert Develop an inspiring paper into your own high-quality original work step by step. Ideal for graduate students seeking to draw inspiration from excellent papers in other disciplines for topic migration, structural reconstruction, and submission optimization. 🔍 Inspiring Literature Identification: Analyze the reusable title mechanisms, problem awareness, chapter structure, theoretical framework, research methods, evidence organization, and language style of the model paper. 🔄 Interdisciplinary Paradigm Transfer: Build a 'source domain—target domain' transfer matrix to determine which ideas can be transferred and which theories, concepts, cases, and conclusions must be reconstructed. 🧠 Original Contribution Modeling: Identify literature gaps, distill core propositions and mechanisms, and check whether the paper merely changes the research object or applies a generic framework. 🧭 Research Design Planning: Supports theoretical research, case studies, qualitative research, quantitative research, literature reviews, policy text analysis, and mixed methods research. 🛡️ Real Evidence Gate: Do not fabricate data, samples, interviews, cases, statistical results, literature, or DOIs; without real evidence, do not generate false empirical conclusions. ✍️ Evidence-Driven Writing: Build argument chains via 'proposition—evidence—citation—rebuttal', generate original content chapter by chapter, and clearly mark research materials that need to be supplemented. 📈 Continuous Paper Evolution: Record each round of revisions, material gaps, and maturity changes according to L1 (topic conception), L2 (research plan), L3 (evidence formation), L4 (submission draft), and L5 (ready for submission). 🧑⚖️ Triple Simulation Review: Identify rejection risks from the perspectives of a theoretical reviewer, a method reviewer, and a target journal reviewer, and form specific revision strategies. 📨 Complete Submission Loop: Assist in generating the final paper, citation verification table, cover letter, innovation point statement, author response, revision index, and related declaration templates. ✨ Learn the paradigm, write original content, and enhance real submission competitiveness.
ResearchAcademic Paper Writing v4.1
A full-process academic paper writing system that combines the Five Sources model with the AFP 3.1 three-layer architecture. Other AI tools help you "write" a paper; this one helps you "plug" every hole that could get it rejected—from one vague idea to a complete submission package in a single run through seven modules, with an anti-hallucination gate, archive-code resume, and four-core review. [10-second value] One sentence of an idea → a submittable, complete paper package. Real sources are enforced throughout, every citation is verifiable, and you can resume across sessions right where you left off. [Trigger phrases] write a paper / literature review / research method design / how to write the discussion / paper polishing / abstract & keywords / submission package [Seven modules, all fully executable instructions] Phase 1 Topic & Introduction → Phase 2 Literature Review → Phase 3 Research Method Design → Phase 4 Discussion → Phase 5 Conclusion → Phase 6 Abstract & Keywords → Phase 7 Full-Text Integration & Submission Package. Phase 0 entry routes A–G map one-to-one to the seven modules, with an R option to restore your last progress via an archive code or archived document. [v4.1 upgrades] 1. Evidence-chain gate (hard constraint): a material registry (M1/M2 numbering) + four citation elements (author / year / title / verifiable locator) + three-color marking (✅ user-supplied / ⚠️ to verify / 🚫 prohibited). If the material library is empty, the system outputs only an outline and search queries and refuses to generate body text with citations; generating references from memory or fabricating volume, issue, or page numbers is forbidden. 2. Archive-code protocol: each module ends with a structured archive code that can be saved as a YouMind document. In your next session, simply reference it with @ to resume without re-requesting already locked information. 3. Reproducible scoring: the C core anchors all dimensions to behavioral standards scored at 4/6/8/10 with stated rationale; the ratchet mechanism only moves scores upward, never downward. 4. Four-discipline configuration library (1A Humanities & Arts / 1B Social Sciences / 2A Science & Engineering / 2B Agriculture, Medicine & Life Sciences), with automatic switching of theory libraries, method toolboxes, and disciplinary norms; Category 2B runs ethics review checkpoints at Phases 0, 3, and 7. 5. Three-paradigm routing (quantitative / qualitative / theoretical): literature review narrative strategies and research method design follow different paths. 6. Anti-cliché checklist and prohibitions: discussion sections using phrases like "limited time and energy" or "pending further research," conclusions introducing new data or literature, and abstracts containing claims unsupported by the body text are all sent back by the B core. 7. Adaptivity: user profile (beginner / intermediate / proficient) + paper type (journal / thesis / conference / course) + pacing mode (default / fast-forward / slow-motion) + multi-task isolation. 8. Submission package & compliance: seven consistency checks, a six-link logic chain, reference formatting (GB/T 7714 / APA 7 / Vancouver / IEEE), ethics approval number, data availability statement, generative AI use disclosure draft, and cover letter draft. [How to use] Tell the system: your discipline, target journal / paper type / word count, and which stage you're at. The system advances module by module, pausing after each one to deliver the section, review report, scorecard, and archive code, then waits for your confirmation before continuing. [Responsibility boundaries] The system handles sources 1–4 (structure, material organization, style, integration); source 5, human calibration, is yours: academic judgment, fact-checking, and innovation decisions. All ⚠️-marked citations and data must be verified by you item by item before submission; this skill does not promise any acceptance or pass outcome.
Prov. Proposal Assistant V2
Prov. proposal writing in art/design
Description
v0.4 Three-Type Source Imitation Edition | Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (Art/Design) Proposal Writing Assistant. Based on the v0.3 Dual Gate (Protocol 7: project benchmarking + Protocol 8: imitation adaptation), a third source imitation type is added: the awarded proposal writing format template (Protocol 9). Research design follows the methodology source, while the written form follows the awarded proposal template; the two source imitation types are layered and not mixed. Protocol 9 includes template hierarchical routing (same-level templates in this province avoid downgrading, syntax priority; cross-level templates undergo downgrade calibration) and the province's five-column practical fingerprint. Default output is a 5,000-character proposal document, with an additional trigger three-piece set.
Related Skills
View allResearch Proposal Assistant
Tailored for university faculty and researchers, this AI assistant provides comprehensive guidance in writing humanities and social science research proposals, covering the entire process from topic generation to outcome planning. Whether you need to brainstorm a topic from scratch or optimize a specific section of your proposal, this tool offers expert-level guidance and support. This assistant combines expert experience with a strategy of 'example guidance + writing theory integration' to help you efficiently produce high-quality proposals. You receive targeted analysis of research hotspots in your discipline, topic refinement suggestions, and—based on your research direction and project type—generate a rigorous background, in-depth literature review, and insightful research value statement. In the research content design phase, the assistant helps you define the research subject, build a logically clear research framework, and recommend innovative research ideas and methods. It also helps you distill key points and difficulties, set clear research objectives, and plan a detailed research schedule and feasibility analysis, ensuring your proposal is rigorous and well-structured. Additionally, you can use this tool to deeply explore the innovative aspects of your topic in terms of academic ideas, viewpoints, and research methods, and systematically plan multiple forms of expected outcomes, their applications, and social benefits. Finally, all content is integrated with one click to generate a complete, logically rigorous proposal that meets submission standards, helping you increase your success rate.
Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert
📚 Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert Develop an inspiring paper into your own high-quality original work step by step. Ideal for graduate students seeking to draw inspiration from excellent papers in other disciplines for topic migration, structural reconstruction, and submission optimization. 🔍 Inspiring Literature Identification: Analyze the reusable title mechanisms, problem awareness, chapter structure, theoretical framework, research methods, evidence organization, and language style of the model paper. 🔄 Interdisciplinary Paradigm Transfer: Build a 'source domain—target domain' transfer matrix to determine which ideas can be transferred and which theories, concepts, cases, and conclusions must be reconstructed. 🧠 Original Contribution Modeling: Identify literature gaps, distill core propositions and mechanisms, and check whether the paper merely changes the research object or applies a generic framework. 🧭 Research Design Planning: Supports theoretical research, case studies, qualitative research, quantitative research, literature reviews, policy text analysis, and mixed methods research. 🛡️ Real Evidence Gate: Do not fabricate data, samples, interviews, cases, statistical results, literature, or DOIs; without real evidence, do not generate false empirical conclusions. ✍️ Evidence-Driven Writing: Build argument chains via 'proposition—evidence—citation—rebuttal', generate original content chapter by chapter, and clearly mark research materials that need to be supplemented. 📈 Continuous Paper Evolution: Record each round of revisions, material gaps, and maturity changes according to L1 (topic conception), L2 (research plan), L3 (evidence formation), L4 (submission draft), and L5 (ready for submission). 🧑⚖️ Triple Simulation Review: Identify rejection risks from the perspectives of a theoretical reviewer, a method reviewer, and a target journal reviewer, and form specific revision strategies. 📨 Complete Submission Loop: Assist in generating the final paper, citation verification table, cover letter, innovation point statement, author response, revision index, and related declaration templates. ✨ Learn the paradigm, write original content, and enhance real submission competitiveness.
ResearchAcademic Paper Writing v4.1
A full-process academic paper writing system that combines the Five Sources model with the AFP 3.1 three-layer architecture. Other AI tools help you "write" a paper; this one helps you "plug" every hole that could get it rejected—from one vague idea to a complete submission package in a single run through seven modules, with an anti-hallucination gate, archive-code resume, and four-core review. [10-second value] One sentence of an idea → a submittable, complete paper package. Real sources are enforced throughout, every citation is verifiable, and you can resume across sessions right where you left off. [Trigger phrases] write a paper / literature review / research method design / how to write the discussion / paper polishing / abstract & keywords / submission package [Seven modules, all fully executable instructions] Phase 1 Topic & Introduction → Phase 2 Literature Review → Phase 3 Research Method Design → Phase 4 Discussion → Phase 5 Conclusion → Phase 6 Abstract & Keywords → Phase 7 Full-Text Integration & Submission Package. Phase 0 entry routes A–G map one-to-one to the seven modules, with an R option to restore your last progress via an archive code or archived document. [v4.1 upgrades] 1. Evidence-chain gate (hard constraint): a material registry (M1/M2 numbering) + four citation elements (author / year / title / verifiable locator) + three-color marking (✅ user-supplied / ⚠️ to verify / 🚫 prohibited). If the material library is empty, the system outputs only an outline and search queries and refuses to generate body text with citations; generating references from memory or fabricating volume, issue, or page numbers is forbidden. 2. Archive-code protocol: each module ends with a structured archive code that can be saved as a YouMind document. In your next session, simply reference it with @ to resume without re-requesting already locked information. 3. Reproducible scoring: the C core anchors all dimensions to behavioral standards scored at 4/6/8/10 with stated rationale; the ratchet mechanism only moves scores upward, never downward. 4. Four-discipline configuration library (1A Humanities & Arts / 1B Social Sciences / 2A Science & Engineering / 2B Agriculture, Medicine & Life Sciences), with automatic switching of theory libraries, method toolboxes, and disciplinary norms; Category 2B runs ethics review checkpoints at Phases 0, 3, and 7. 5. Three-paradigm routing (quantitative / qualitative / theoretical): literature review narrative strategies and research method design follow different paths. 6. Anti-cliché checklist and prohibitions: discussion sections using phrases like "limited time and energy" or "pending further research," conclusions introducing new data or literature, and abstracts containing claims unsupported by the body text are all sent back by the B core. 7. Adaptivity: user profile (beginner / intermediate / proficient) + paper type (journal / thesis / conference / course) + pacing mode (default / fast-forward / slow-motion) + multi-task isolation. 8. Submission package & compliance: seven consistency checks, a six-link logic chain, reference formatting (GB/T 7714 / APA 7 / Vancouver / IEEE), ethics approval number, data availability statement, generative AI use disclosure draft, and cover letter draft. [How to use] Tell the system: your discipline, target journal / paper type / word count, and which stage you're at. The system advances module by module, pausing after each one to deliver the section, review report, scorecard, and archive code, then waits for your confirmation before continuing. [Responsibility boundaries] The system handles sources 1–4 (structure, material organization, style, integration); source 5, human calibration, is yours: academic judgment, fact-checking, and innovation decisions. All ⚠️-marked citations and data must be verified by you item by item before submission; this skill does not promise any acceptance or pass outcome.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.