In-depth long article rewriting

installedBy
172
categoryLabelWrite
fromYouMind

Why we love this skill

This skill can transform complex, lengthy articles into viral content. It uses relatable openings like "If you were…", relatable metaphors, and a logical flow of "why → what → how," ensuring the content is easy to understand and provides actionable guidance. Whether it's complex concepts or industry insights, it can be transformed into engaging and relatable high-quality content.

Instructions

**Step 1: Clarifying Values ​​and Goals** Before starting the rewriting, I need to understand your creative intent. Please answer the following questions: 1. **Who is your target audience?** (e.g., white-collar workers, entrepreneurs, students, stay-at-home mothers, etc.) 2. **What feelings do you hope readers will have after reading this?** (e.g., warning, inspiration, action, resonance, etc.) 3. **What core value do you want to convey?** (e.g., providing solutions, sparking thought, sharing methodologies, etc.) 4. **What is your stance?** (e.g., objectivity and neutrality, optimism, critical thinking, etc.) If the user provides an article link (especially an English link), use a fetch tool to obtain the original content. If it involves complex industry terminology or requires background information, use Google Search to supplement the information. Based on the user's answers, clarify the direction and tone of the article, laying the foundation for subsequent rewriting.
**Step Two: Building a Viral Article Framework** Based on the direction confirmed in Step One, build a complete structural framework for the article: **Opening Section (Creating Immersion):** - Use the "If you were..." structure to instantly make the reader feel, "This concerns me." - List 3-4 specific scenarios, covering the core pain points of the target audience. - Create a sense of urgency: use elements such as time, data, and consequences. **Middle Section (Explaining the Logic):** - Break down complex concepts into 3-5 core viewpoints. - Each viewpoint is developed using the logic of "Why → What → How." - Reserve space for "metaphors/stories" (to be filled in the next step). **Conclusion Section (Providing Action Guidelines):** - Macro level: 3 possible solutions/trend analysis. - Micro level: 5-10 specific and actionable suggestions. - The structure of each suggestion: Why is it important + How to do it + specific examples. Show this framework to the user for confirmation and ask if the structure or focus needs to be adjusted.
**Step 3: Rewriting to Make it More Relatable (Core Step)** Now start filling the framework into complete article content, focusing on "simplifying the complex and making the abstract concrete": **1. Replace technical terms with metaphors:** - Identify all academic terms, economic concepts, and abstract theories in the original text. - Design a relatable metaphor for each core concept. - Metaphor requirements: concrete (bubble tea shop > small shop), vivid imagery, and relevant to Chinese people's daily lives. - For example: "AI efficiency paradox" → "The bubble tea shop owner bought an AI machine, three young women lost their jobs, they had no money to spend, and the economy collapsed." **2. Use short sentences and dialogue:** - Each sentence should not exceed 20 characters. - Use dialogue-like phrases such as "You might think... but actually..." and "Many people think... but actually..." - Avoid long, complex sentences and nested clauses. **3. Inject a combination of emotion and rationality:** - Beginning: Use emotion to attract attention (anxiety, curiosity, resonance) - Middle: Use rationality to provide value (data, logic, case studies) - Ending: Give hope and direction (avoid leaving readers in despair). **4. Optimize the title:** - Title formula: Time (creates a sense of urgency) + Consequences (creates fear/curiosity) + Data (creates a sense of realism) - Provides 3 title options for users to choose from to generate a complete first draft of the article using the write tool.
**Step 4: Iterative Optimization** The first draft is never the final version. Now, let's move on to the iterative optimization phase: **Self-Checklist:** 1. **Introduction:** After reading the first three paragraphs, does the reader feel, "This is relevant to me; I must read it"? 2. **Middle:** Are each core point supported by a specific metaphor/story? Are they easy to understand? 3. **Conclusion:** After reading, does the reader know "What should I do now?" Are the suggestions specific and actionable? 4. **Tone:** Does it match the "stance" and "warmth" confirmed by the user in Step 1? 5. **Length:** Is it controlled within 3000-5000 words? (Too short lacks depth; too long, no one reads) **Actively Ask the User:** - "After reading, do you feel this is what you wanted to express?" - "What parts of the tone/details need adjustment?" - "Are any metaphors not relatable enough and need to be replaced?" Based on user feedback, use editing tools to make targeted modifications. Repeat this process until the user says, "Yes, this is exactly what I wanted to say." **Final Delivery:** - Provide the final version of the article - Include a "Publishing Suggestion": suitable platforms (Xiaohongshu/Douyin/WeChat Official Account), optimal publishing time, and suggested images - Remind users: A viral hit = direction (50%) + content (30%) + luck (20%), continuous creation is key.

description

Transform complex, academic, and English articles into relatable, engaging, and widely shareable in-depth content. Through a four-step method—clarifying values, restructuring the structure, rewriting to make it more relatable, and iterative refinement—we help you create articles that resonate emotionally and offer rational value. Ideal for rewriting industry reports, academic papers, and long English articles into viral content with over 100,000 views.

Related Skills

View all
Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v2.0

Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v2.0

Native-speaker editor-level paper polishing, three-track customized approach directly meeting top journal review standards. Three independent engines precisely align with your target submission model: A. Journal Benchmarking: Locking onto the style guidelines of top journals like Nature and IEEE, utilizing the journal's unique sentence structure preferences (Nature prefers active voice + interdisciplinary readability, IEEE prefers passive voice + high-density technical vocabulary), ensuring your draft directly matches the target journal's standard model. B. Model Article Replication: In-depth analysis of the sentence structure, conjunction preferences, and writing rhythm of your favorite benchmark articles, making your manuscript infinitely close to the top journal's model in language style. C. Pure Refinement: Activating universal top journal standards, performing four-dimensional foundation polishing (grammar correction, word restructuring, intonation unification, extreme clarity), significantly enhancing academic tension and readability. Surgical-level block-by-block refinement, every change is visible and logically enforced. Forced block processing (500-800 words each time) breaks through the AI ​​attention window limitation, polishing sentence by sentence without roughness. Dual-core adversarial engine (Core A language restructuring + ... (Core B Quality Control) Transparent annotation throughout, outputting 3-5 editor-in-chief level revision notes each time, explaining "why this revision aligns with top journal preferences." Absolutely faithful semantics: only changes the expression, not the core content; never tamper with data or invent new viewpoints for you. After opening, directly select the polishing mode (A Journal Benchmark/B Sample Replication/C Pure Refinement), then paste your paper in paragraphs (500-800 words per paragraph is recommended, such as the first half of the introduction). The system will refine each paragraph with editor-in-chief annotations. After confirming there are no errors, proceed to the next paragraph. Fully interactive guidance, no complex configuration required. The accompanying tool, the official polishing module of the "Academic Paper Full-Process Writing System v3.1 (Wuyuan × AFP)," forms a complete closed loop from topic selection to drafting to final polishing. Applicable scenarios: Papers requested by reviewers to be "native-language polished," papers aiming for top journals like Nature/Science, and master's/doctoral students and young scholars wanting to learn the writing style of top journals. Key differences: Several times cheaper than hiring a polishing company, several times more accurate than AI-powered one-shot revisions, and several times more efficient than blind self-editing.

Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v2.0
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)

Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)

This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".

Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)

Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)

From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.

Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)

Find your next favorite skill

Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.

Explore all skills