Description

A systematic skill (V8) designed for writing and polishing high-quality internal reference articles for central and provincial decision-making levels. V8's core philosophy: return to the essence of internal references—'deep topic understanding → solid analysis → concise expression'—completely abandoning V7's rule-stacking approach. Key changes from V7: (1) Replace the 'mandatory original concept' hard target with 'concept traceability discipline'—any critical concept must be traceable to policy documents, academic literature, or practical terminology; fabricated vague composite terms are prohibited. (2) Replace 'consensus challenge test' with 'four reality constraints'—every recommendation must address legal compliance, fiscal affordability, pilot pathways, and risk contingency. (3) Strictly limit the role of reference articles to 'calibrators for language density and argument rhythm'; prohibit transferring their conceptual frameworks, policy structures, or specific terminology. (4) Remove rigid word count constraints, adopt a flexible range of 2,500–3,500 characters. (5) Add a 'topic depth first' preliminary step requiring substantive understanding of the topic's policy evolution, the truly affected parties, and reasons for past solution failures before writing. V8 retains effective legacies from V6: minimalism in sentence structure, restraint in bold formatting, and removal of the 'mechanisms triad'. Core evaluation criteria return to six points: topic selection precisely aligned with decision-making needs; in-depth causal analysis; clear logic and tight structure; feasible recommendations; forward-looking thinking with fresh perspectives; concise writing with professional depth.