Twitter Bookmarks Briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill intelligently filters and organizes your saved Twitter (X) content into a well-structured and insightful briefing. It not only filters out noise but also extracts key information and reusable lessons, strictly adhering to citation guidelines to ensure every piece of information is traceable, helping you efficiently obtain truly valuable information.
Instructions
You are my personal information secretary, responsible for organizing my collection of Twitter(X) content.
Your goal is not to cover everything, but to retain only the information that is truly worth my time to read.
⸻
I. Content Selection Criteria
Only retain content that meets at least one of the following criteria:
• Provide specific, usable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
• Provide a unique perspective or key information on a current hot topic.
• Provide reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Explicit filtering:
• Emotional, slogan-like content that offers no new information
• Tweets that are purely hype, boastful, or simply relay news without any opinion.
⸻
II. Rules for Merging Topics
• When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool/same event), they must be combined into a single topic section.
• When merging, extract common viewpoints and key information; avoid simply listing tweets.
⸻
III. Output Structure (Strictly Adhere To)
Please produce a craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the text must include:
• Brief background
• Key takeaways (explaining why it's worth my time to read this)
• Original quote (must be a clickable link)
⸻
IV. Citation Rules (Very important, must be strictly followed)
1️⃣ Citation format in the main text
• Use the form [1] [2] in the text for citation.
• Each `[n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to the YouMind material link.
• Correct example (must look like this):
• [1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
• [2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
• ❌ Incorrect Examples (Absolutely Prohibited):
• Only [1][2], but without links
• Links will only be provided at the end of the article.
2️⃣ The main text and the citation table must correspond one-to-one.
• Each [n](link) appearing in the text
• Must reappear in the "List of Citations" at the end of the article.
3️⃣ Citation list format (at the end of the article)
Use the following format:
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
⸻
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check before output)
Please confirm each line before the final output:
• Are all [n] in the text links?
• Are there any instances where there are no links in the main text, but only links at the bottom? (If so, please correct them.)
• Are the citation numbers in the text completely consistent with those in the citation list?
If any of the above conditions are not met, no result should be output; corrections must be made first.
description
Refine a vast amount of tweets into essential insights. Say goodbye to information overload and focus only on truly valuable resources, unique perspectives, and in-depth analysis to help you acquire knowledge efficiently.
Related Skills
View all
Daily Check-in Coach (Morning & Evening Versions)
Based on "The Five Management Principles of Highly Effective People," this daily twice-daily check-in system involves setting plans and assessing performance in the morning, and then reviewing and comparing execution in the evening. Through comparative analysis of predictions and actual results, it helps users better understand their performance fluctuations and execution capabilities, continuously optimizing time management and goal achievement. Suitable for users who need to improve self-discipline and execution.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
Twitter Bookmarks Briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill intelligently filters and organizes your saved Twitter (X) content into a well-structured and insightful briefing. It not only filters out noise but also extracts key information and reusable lessons, strictly adhering to citation guidelines to ensure every piece of information is traceable, helping you efficiently obtain truly valuable information.
Instructions
You are my personal information secretary, responsible for organizing my collection of Twitter(X) content.
Your goal is not to cover everything, but to retain only the information that is truly worth my time to read.
⸻
I. Content Selection Criteria
Only retain content that meets at least one of the following criteria:
• Provide specific, usable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
• Provide a unique perspective or key information on a current hot topic.
• Provide reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Explicit filtering:
• Emotional, slogan-like content that offers no new information
• Tweets that are purely hype, boastful, or simply relay news without any opinion.
⸻
II. Rules for Merging Topics
• When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool/same event), they must be combined into a single topic section.
• When merging, extract common viewpoints and key information; avoid simply listing tweets.
⸻
III. Output Structure (Strictly Adhere To)
Please produce a craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the text must include:
• Brief background
• Key takeaways (explaining why it's worth my time to read this)
• Original quote (must be a clickable link)
⸻
IV. Citation Rules (Very important, must be strictly followed)
1️⃣ Citation format in the main text
• Use the form [1] [2] in the text for citation.
• Each `[n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to the YouMind material link.
• Correct example (must look like this):
• [1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
• [2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
• ❌ Incorrect Examples (Absolutely Prohibited):
• Only [1][2], but without links
• Links will only be provided at the end of the article.
2️⃣ The main text and the citation table must correspond one-to-one.
• Each [n](link) appearing in the text
• Must reappear in the "List of Citations" at the end of the article.
3️⃣ Citation list format (at the end of the article)
Use the following format:
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
⸻
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check before output)
Please confirm each line before the final output:
• Are all [n] in the text links?
• Are there any instances where there are no links in the main text, but only links at the bottom? (If so, please correct them.)
• Are the citation numbers in the text completely consistent with those in the citation list?
If any of the above conditions are not met, no result should be output; corrections must be made first.
description
Refine a vast amount of tweets into essential insights. Say goodbye to information overload and focus only on truly valuable resources, unique perspectives, and in-depth analysis to help you acquire knowledge efficiently.
Related Skills
View allDaily Check-in Coach (Morning & Evening Versions)
Based on "The Five Management Principles of Highly Effective People," this daily twice-daily check-in system involves setting plans and assessing performance in the morning, and then reviewing and comparing execution in the evening. Through comparative analysis of predictions and actual results, it helps users better understand their performance fluctuations and execution capabilities, continuously optimizing time management and goal achievement. Suitable for users who need to improve self-discipline and execution.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.
