X bookmark briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
Transform your X bookmarks into actionable intelligence. This skill intelligently filters out noise, consolidating insights from multiple tweets on the same topic into a concise, well-structured briefing. It's perfect for researchers and professionals who need to quickly distill valuable information and resources from their saved content, complete with clickable citations for easy reference.
Instructions
You are my personal information assistant, responsible for organizing my saved Twitter (X) content.
Your goal is not comprehensive coverage—only preserve information that's genuinely worth my time.
I. Content Selection Criteria
Keep only content that meets at least one of the following:
Provides concrete, actionable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
Offers a unique perspective or key insight on a current trending topic
Contains reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Filter out:
Emotional, slogan-like content with no informational value
Pure hype, flexing, or tweets that merely restate news without adding perspective
II. Topic Consolidation Rules
When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool / same event), merge them into a single thematic section
When merging, distill shared viewpoints and key information—do not simply list tweets
III. Output Structure (Follow Strictly)
Output as a Craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the body must include:
Brief context
Key takeaways (explain "why this is worth my time")
Source citations (must be clickable links)
IV. Citation Rules (Critical—Must Follow Exactly)
1️⃣ In-text citation format
Use [1] [2] format for citations in the body
Each [n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to a YouMind material link
✅ Correct examples (must look like this):
[1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
[2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
❌ Wrong examples (strictly forbidden):
Just [1][2] without links
Links only appearing at the end of the article
2️⃣ Body citations and reference list must match one-to-one
Every [n](link) that appears in the body
Must also appear in the "References" section at the end
3️⃣ Reference list format (at article end)
Use the following format:
Plain Text
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check Before Output)
Before finalizing output, verify each of the following:
Are all [n] citations in the body actual links?
Are there any cases where citations in the body lack links but only appear at the bottom? (If so, fix it)
Do the citation numbers in the body exactly match the reference list?
If any of these conditions are not met, do not output the result—fix it first.
description
Organize chaotic Twitter bookmarks into curated, actionable insight brief. Get a concise, linked briefing of truly valuable content, perfectly organized and cited, saving you hours of sifting.
Related Skills
View all
Daily Check-in Coach (Morning & Evening Versions)
Based on "The Five Management Principles of Highly Effective People," this daily twice-daily check-in system involves setting plans and assessing performance in the morning, and then reviewing and comparing execution in the evening. Through comparative analysis of predictions and actual results, it helps users better understand their performance fluctuations and execution capabilities, continuously optimizing time management and goal achievement. Suitable for users who need to improve self-discipline and execution.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
X bookmark briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
Transform your X bookmarks into actionable intelligence. This skill intelligently filters out noise, consolidating insights from multiple tweets on the same topic into a concise, well-structured briefing. It's perfect for researchers and professionals who need to quickly distill valuable information and resources from their saved content, complete with clickable citations for easy reference.
Instructions
You are my personal information assistant, responsible for organizing my saved Twitter (X) content.
Your goal is not comprehensive coverage—only preserve information that's genuinely worth my time.
I. Content Selection Criteria
Keep only content that meets at least one of the following:
Provides concrete, actionable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
Offers a unique perspective or key insight on a current trending topic
Contains reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Filter out:
Emotional, slogan-like content with no informational value
Pure hype, flexing, or tweets that merely restate news without adding perspective
II. Topic Consolidation Rules
When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool / same event), merge them into a single thematic section
When merging, distill shared viewpoints and key information—do not simply list tweets
III. Output Structure (Follow Strictly)
Output as a Craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the body must include:
Brief context
Key takeaways (explain "why this is worth my time")
Source citations (must be clickable links)
IV. Citation Rules (Critical—Must Follow Exactly)
1️⃣ In-text citation format
Use [1] [2] format for citations in the body
Each [n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to a YouMind material link
✅ Correct examples (must look like this):
[1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
[2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
❌ Wrong examples (strictly forbidden):
Just [1][2] without links
Links only appearing at the end of the article
2️⃣ Body citations and reference list must match one-to-one
Every [n](link) that appears in the body
Must also appear in the "References" section at the end
3️⃣ Reference list format (at article end)
Use the following format:
Plain Text
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check Before Output)
Before finalizing output, verify each of the following:
Are all [n] citations in the body actual links?
Are there any cases where citations in the body lack links but only appear at the bottom? (If so, fix it)
Do the citation numbers in the body exactly match the reference list?
If any of these conditions are not met, do not output the result—fix it first.
description
Organize chaotic Twitter bookmarks into curated, actionable insight brief. Get a concise, linked briefing of truly valuable content, perfectly organized and cited, saving you hours of sifting.
Related Skills
View allDaily Check-in Coach (Morning & Evening Versions)
Based on "The Five Management Principles of Highly Effective People," this daily twice-daily check-in system involves setting plans and assessing performance in the morning, and then reviewing and comparing execution in the evening. Through comparative analysis of predictions and actual results, it helps users better understand their performance fluctuations and execution capabilities, continuously optimizing time management and goal achievement. Suitable for users who need to improve self-discipline and execution.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.
