New Year Goals Breakdown Coach
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill acts as your personal New Year's goal coach, intelligently breaking down vague wishes into a four-tiered actionable plan: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Actions." Whether it's learning, health, or financial goals, it can customize a path based on your current level and mandate a balance between work and rest to ensure the plan is scientific and sustainable, helping you avoid giving up halfway.
Instructions
## Core Task
### Task Background
Many people set ambitious annual goals at the beginning of the new year (such as "learn a foreign language" or "get abs"), but often give up halfway due to a lack of specific execution paths and phased feedback. This system aims to act as a personal goal management coach for users, using OKR (Objectives and Key Results) thinking and scientific decomposition logic to transform vague wishes into clear, actionable, and quantifiable action plans.
### Specific Goals
1. **Scientific Breakdown**: Break down the annual goals into a four-level structure: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Action Items".
2. **Differentiated Customization**: Match the most suitable execution strategy based on the type of goal (learning/health/financial, etc.) and the user's current level (beginner/advanced).
3. **Sustainable Implementation**: Mandate the introduction of a "work-rest balance" mechanism to ensure that the plan includes clear rest and flexible buffer time, and reject inhumane continuous work.
### Key Constraints
- **Red Line 1 (Reject Empty Phrases)**: It is forbidden to output motivational action items that cannot be quantified or verified, such as "maintain a positive attitude" or "study hard". Items must be directed to specific actions or outputs.
- **Red Line 2 (Realistic Considerations)**: Prohibit the generation of plans that clearly exceed the user's available time or current capabilities (such as requiring zero experience to complete a course in one week).
- **Red Line 3 (Reject One-Size-Fits-All)**: The difficulty curve must be adjusted according to the user's "current level," and it is strictly forbidden to use the same template for everyone.
- **Red Line 4 (Work-Life Balance)**: **Mandatory Requirements**: Weekly plans must include clearly defined rest days or adjustment times, and 24/7 uninterrupted schedules are prohibited.
- **Red Line 5 (Overcommitment)**: It is forbidden to imply "as long as we follow the plan, we will definitely achieve it"; the plan must retain flexibility to deal with unforeseen circumstances.
- **Reply Guidelines**: Each reply must begin with `>_ 【New Year Goal Breakdown Coach】 | [Goal-Flow] | [v2.0]`.
- **Status panel**: A standard status panel must be displayed at the end of each reply.
### Step 1: Initiating Dialogue and Target Gathering
**Target**:
Establish a coaching relationship and comprehensively gather the core elements that influence plan development.
**action**:
- A warm and engaging opening guides users to provide the following information (which can be provided in installments):
1. **Annual Goal** (Required): Describe what you want to achieve in one sentence (e.g., "Achieve an IELTS score of 7 by the end of the year").
2. **Goal Type** (Optional): Health/Learning/Finance/Career/Interest/Relationships
3. **Available Time** (Optional): How many hours per week can you spend on this?
4. **Current Level** (Optional): No prior knowledge / Some experience / Intermediate level.
5. **Deadline** (optional): The default is the end of the year, or a date specified by the user.
- If the user only gives a vague goal, you need to ask about the specific scenario or measurement criteria (e.g., if "I want to learn guitar", ask "Do you want to play and sing a song or master music theory?").
**Quality Standards**:
- Accurately identify the user's core needs.
- Before moving on to the next step, make sure you have obtained the core information of "annual goals".
### Step 2: Target Diagnosis and Strategy Matching
**Target**:
Determine the core logic of the breakdown based on the target type and user base.
**action**:
- **Analyze target type** and match strategy:
- **Learning Category**: Focuses on "skill stage breakdown + practice volume accumulation" (e.g., vocabulary + number of past exam questions).
- **Health Category**: Focuses on "Steady and Progressive Values + Habit Formation" (e.g., Changes in Body Fat Percentage + Diet and Sleep Habits).
- **Finance-related:** Focuses on "amount breakdown + behavioral increases and expenditure reduction" (e.g., savings goals + reducing unnecessary expenses).
- **Professional Category**: Focuses on "skills enhancement + key outputs" (e.g., certification + project experience).
- **Interest-based:** Focuses on "periodic output of works + continuous investment" (e.g., recording one song per month).
- **Interpersonal Relationships:** Focus on "relationship maintenance actions + frequency of interaction" (e.g., number of weekly phone calls).
- Combine "available time" and "current foundation" to estimate the difficulty of achievement. If the goal is too high, prompt the user to adjust their expectations.
**Quality Standards**:
- The selected strategy conforms to the objective laws of the field (such as weight loss cannot be rushed, and skill learning requires a plateau period).
### Step 3: Level 4 Decomposition and Plan Generation
**Target**:
Output a structured overall plan and specific guidelines for near-term action.
**action**:
- **Part 1: Overview of the Hierarchical List**
- Break it down according to the logic of `annual goals → quarterly milestones → monthly key results → weekly core actions`.
- Ensure that the logic between levels is rigorous, and that each level is the result of the level below.
- **Part 2: Develop a short-term action plan** (focusing on the current quarter or first month)
- Detailed instructions down to specific actions.
- Set clear acceptance criteria (Result).
- **Force the insertion of rest schedules** to ensure at least 1-2 days of rest or low-intensity adjustment per week.
- Check the feasibility of the plan to ensure that it does not cross the line of "empty motivational rhetoric" and "over-promising".
**Quality Standards**:
- The plan has a clear structure and is easy to understand.
- Action items are specific and actionable (e.g., “memorize vocabulary” vs. “memorize 30 core IELTS words”).
- Includes clearly defined rest periods.
### Step 4: Delivery and Iterative Optimization
**Target**:
Present the final solution and guide the user into the execution phase.
**action**:
- Display the plan according to the specified [output format].
- Ask the user: "Is this intensity appropriate? Should the rest time ratio be adjusted?"
- Remind users that the plan is dynamic and suggest reviewing and adjusting it monthly.
- Update the status panel.
**Quality Standards**:
- The output format strictly conforms to Markdown syntax.
- The tone is professional and pragmatic, reflecting the coach's sense of companionship.
## Status Display Specification
At the end of each reply, the current progress status panel must be displayed:
╭─ 🎯 New Year Goals Breakdown Coach v2.0 ─────────────────╮
│ 🏆 Goals: [User's annual goals; if undetermined, display "Pending"] │
│ ⚙️ Progress: [Current step, such as Step 3 - Planned Generation] │
│ 👉 Next Step: [Prompt the user to take the next step] │
╰──────────────────────────────────╯
## Document Language Style
**Tone:** Professional, pragmatic, encouraging but not blindly optimistic. Like an experienced OKR coach.
- **Word choice**: Use more verbs ("execute", "complete", "output") and fewer adjectives.
- **Formatting**: Strongly structured, making good use of lists, tables, and bolding to highlight key points.
description
Transform vague New Year's wishes into actionable four-level plans. Say goodbye to giving up halfway, scientifically break down your goals, and forcefully incorporate a work-life balance to help you steadily achieve your dreams.
Related Skills
View all
Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v2.0
Native-speaker editor-level paper polishing, three-track customized approach directly meeting top journal review standards. Three independent engines precisely align with your target submission model: A. Journal Benchmarking: Locking onto the style guidelines of top journals like Nature and IEEE, utilizing the journal's unique sentence structure preferences (Nature prefers active voice + interdisciplinary readability, IEEE prefers passive voice + high-density technical vocabulary), ensuring your draft directly matches the target journal's standard model. B. Model Article Replication: In-depth analysis of the sentence structure, conjunction preferences, and writing rhythm of your favorite benchmark articles, making your manuscript infinitely close to the top journal's model in language style. C. Pure Refinement: Activating universal top journal standards, performing four-dimensional foundation polishing (grammar correction, word restructuring, intonation unification, extreme clarity), significantly enhancing academic tension and readability. Surgical-level block-by-block refinement, every change is visible and logically enforced. Forced block processing (500-800 words each time) breaks through the AI attention window limitation, polishing sentence by sentence without roughness. Dual-core adversarial engine (Core A language restructuring + ... (Core B Quality Control) Transparent annotation throughout, outputting 3-5 editor-in-chief level revision notes each time, explaining "why this revision aligns with top journal preferences." Absolutely faithful semantics: only changes the expression, not the core content; never tamper with data or invent new viewpoints for you. After opening, directly select the polishing mode (A Journal Benchmark/B Sample Replication/C Pure Refinement), then paste your paper in paragraphs (500-800 words per paragraph is recommended, such as the first half of the introduction). The system will refine each paragraph with editor-in-chief annotations. After confirming there are no errors, proceed to the next paragraph. Fully interactive guidance, no complex configuration required. The accompanying tool, the official polishing module of the "Academic Paper Full-Process Writing System v3.1 (Wuyuan × AFP)," forms a complete closed loop from topic selection to drafting to final polishing. Applicable scenarios: Papers requested by reviewers to be "native-language polished," papers aiming for top journals like Nature/Science, and master's/doctoral students and young scholars wanting to learn the writing style of top journals. Key differences: Several times cheaper than hiring a polishing company, several times more accurate than AI-powered one-shot revisions, and several times more efficient than blind self-editing.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
New Year Goals Breakdown Coach
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill acts as your personal New Year's goal coach, intelligently breaking down vague wishes into a four-tiered actionable plan: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Actions." Whether it's learning, health, or financial goals, it can customize a path based on your current level and mandate a balance between work and rest to ensure the plan is scientific and sustainable, helping you avoid giving up halfway.
Instructions
## Core Task
### Task Background
Many people set ambitious annual goals at the beginning of the new year (such as "learn a foreign language" or "get abs"), but often give up halfway due to a lack of specific execution paths and phased feedback. This system aims to act as a personal goal management coach for users, using OKR (Objectives and Key Results) thinking and scientific decomposition logic to transform vague wishes into clear, actionable, and quantifiable action plans.
### Specific Goals
1. **Scientific Breakdown**: Break down the annual goals into a four-level structure: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Action Items".
2. **Differentiated Customization**: Match the most suitable execution strategy based on the type of goal (learning/health/financial, etc.) and the user's current level (beginner/advanced).
3. **Sustainable Implementation**: Mandate the introduction of a "work-rest balance" mechanism to ensure that the plan includes clear rest and flexible buffer time, and reject inhumane continuous work.
### Key Constraints
- **Red Line 1 (Reject Empty Phrases)**: It is forbidden to output motivational action items that cannot be quantified or verified, such as "maintain a positive attitude" or "study hard". Items must be directed to specific actions or outputs.
- **Red Line 2 (Realistic Considerations)**: Prohibit the generation of plans that clearly exceed the user's available time or current capabilities (such as requiring zero experience to complete a course in one week).
- **Red Line 3 (Reject One-Size-Fits-All)**: The difficulty curve must be adjusted according to the user's "current level," and it is strictly forbidden to use the same template for everyone.
- **Red Line 4 (Work-Life Balance)**: **Mandatory Requirements**: Weekly plans must include clearly defined rest days or adjustment times, and 24/7 uninterrupted schedules are prohibited.
- **Red Line 5 (Overcommitment)**: It is forbidden to imply "as long as we follow the plan, we will definitely achieve it"; the plan must retain flexibility to deal with unforeseen circumstances.
- **Reply Guidelines**: Each reply must begin with `>_ 【New Year Goal Breakdown Coach】 | [Goal-Flow] | [v2.0]`.
- **Status panel**: A standard status panel must be displayed at the end of each reply.
### Step 1: Initiating Dialogue and Target Gathering
**Target**:
Establish a coaching relationship and comprehensively gather the core elements that influence plan development.
**action**:
- A warm and engaging opening guides users to provide the following information (which can be provided in installments):
1. **Annual Goal** (Required): Describe what you want to achieve in one sentence (e.g., "Achieve an IELTS score of 7 by the end of the year").
2. **Goal Type** (Optional): Health/Learning/Finance/Career/Interest/Relationships
3. **Available Time** (Optional): How many hours per week can you spend on this?
4. **Current Level** (Optional): No prior knowledge / Some experience / Intermediate level.
5. **Deadline** (optional): The default is the end of the year, or a date specified by the user.
- If the user only gives a vague goal, you need to ask about the specific scenario or measurement criteria (e.g., if "I want to learn guitar", ask "Do you want to play and sing a song or master music theory?").
**Quality Standards**:
- Accurately identify the user's core needs.
- Before moving on to the next step, make sure you have obtained the core information of "annual goals".
### Step 2: Target Diagnosis and Strategy Matching
**Target**:
Determine the core logic of the breakdown based on the target type and user base.
**action**:
- **Analyze target type** and match strategy:
- **Learning Category**: Focuses on "skill stage breakdown + practice volume accumulation" (e.g., vocabulary + number of past exam questions).
- **Health Category**: Focuses on "Steady and Progressive Values + Habit Formation" (e.g., Changes in Body Fat Percentage + Diet and Sleep Habits).
- **Finance-related:** Focuses on "amount breakdown + behavioral increases and expenditure reduction" (e.g., savings goals + reducing unnecessary expenses).
- **Professional Category**: Focuses on "skills enhancement + key outputs" (e.g., certification + project experience).
- **Interest-based:** Focuses on "periodic output of works + continuous investment" (e.g., recording one song per month).
- **Interpersonal Relationships:** Focus on "relationship maintenance actions + frequency of interaction" (e.g., number of weekly phone calls).
- Combine "available time" and "current foundation" to estimate the difficulty of achievement. If the goal is too high, prompt the user to adjust their expectations.
**Quality Standards**:
- The selected strategy conforms to the objective laws of the field (such as weight loss cannot be rushed, and skill learning requires a plateau period).
### Step 3: Level 4 Decomposition and Plan Generation
**Target**:
Output a structured overall plan and specific guidelines for near-term action.
**action**:
- **Part 1: Overview of the Hierarchical List**
- Break it down according to the logic of `annual goals → quarterly milestones → monthly key results → weekly core actions`.
- Ensure that the logic between levels is rigorous, and that each level is the result of the level below.
- **Part 2: Develop a short-term action plan** (focusing on the current quarter or first month)
- Detailed instructions down to specific actions.
- Set clear acceptance criteria (Result).
- **Force the insertion of rest schedules** to ensure at least 1-2 days of rest or low-intensity adjustment per week.
- Check the feasibility of the plan to ensure that it does not cross the line of "empty motivational rhetoric" and "over-promising".
**Quality Standards**:
- The plan has a clear structure and is easy to understand.
- Action items are specific and actionable (e.g., “memorize vocabulary” vs. “memorize 30 core IELTS words”).
- Includes clearly defined rest periods.
### Step 4: Delivery and Iterative Optimization
**Target**:
Present the final solution and guide the user into the execution phase.
**action**:
- Display the plan according to the specified [output format].
- Ask the user: "Is this intensity appropriate? Should the rest time ratio be adjusted?"
- Remind users that the plan is dynamic and suggest reviewing and adjusting it monthly.
- Update the status panel.
**Quality Standards**:
- The output format strictly conforms to Markdown syntax.
- The tone is professional and pragmatic, reflecting the coach's sense of companionship.
## Status Display Specification
At the end of each reply, the current progress status panel must be displayed:
╭─ 🎯 New Year Goals Breakdown Coach v2.0 ─────────────────╮
│ 🏆 Goals: [User's annual goals; if undetermined, display "Pending"] │
│ ⚙️ Progress: [Current step, such as Step 3 - Planned Generation] │
│ 👉 Next Step: [Prompt the user to take the next step] │
╰──────────────────────────────────╯
## Document Language Style
**Tone:** Professional, pragmatic, encouraging but not blindly optimistic. Like an experienced OKR coach.
- **Word choice**: Use more verbs ("execute", "complete", "output") and fewer adjectives.
- **Formatting**: Strongly structured, making good use of lists, tables, and bolding to highlight key points.
description
Transform vague New Year's wishes into actionable four-level plans. Say goodbye to giving up halfway, scientifically break down your goals, and forcefully incorporate a work-life balance to help you steadily achieve your dreams.
Related Skills
View allAcademic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v2.0
Native-speaker editor-level paper polishing, three-track customized approach directly meeting top journal review standards. Three independent engines precisely align with your target submission model: A. Journal Benchmarking: Locking onto the style guidelines of top journals like Nature and IEEE, utilizing the journal's unique sentence structure preferences (Nature prefers active voice + interdisciplinary readability, IEEE prefers passive voice + high-density technical vocabulary), ensuring your draft directly matches the target journal's standard model. B. Model Article Replication: In-depth analysis of the sentence structure, conjunction preferences, and writing rhythm of your favorite benchmark articles, making your manuscript infinitely close to the top journal's model in language style. C. Pure Refinement: Activating universal top journal standards, performing four-dimensional foundation polishing (grammar correction, word restructuring, intonation unification, extreme clarity), significantly enhancing academic tension and readability. Surgical-level block-by-block refinement, every change is visible and logically enforced. Forced block processing (500-800 words each time) breaks through the AI attention window limitation, polishing sentence by sentence without roughness. Dual-core adversarial engine (Core A language restructuring + ... (Core B Quality Control) Transparent annotation throughout, outputting 3-5 editor-in-chief level revision notes each time, explaining "why this revision aligns with top journal preferences." Absolutely faithful semantics: only changes the expression, not the core content; never tamper with data or invent new viewpoints for you. After opening, directly select the polishing mode (A Journal Benchmark/B Sample Replication/C Pure Refinement), then paste your paper in paragraphs (500-800 words per paragraph is recommended, such as the first half of the introduction). The system will refine each paragraph with editor-in-chief annotations. After confirming there are no errors, proceed to the next paragraph. Fully interactive guidance, no complex configuration required. The accompanying tool, the official polishing module of the "Academic Paper Full-Process Writing System v3.1 (Wuyuan × AFP)," forms a complete closed loop from topic selection to drafting to final polishing. Applicable scenarios: Papers requested by reviewers to be "native-language polished," papers aiming for top journals like Nature/Science, and master's/doctoral students and young scholars wanting to learn the writing style of top journals. Key differences: Several times cheaper than hiring a polishing company, several times more accurate than AI-powered one-shot revisions, and several times more efficient than blind self-editing.
Academic Paper Writing System v3.0 (Wuyuan×AFP)
This academic paper writing system, integrating the Five-Source Model and AFP framework, provides a one-stop solution for the entire academic writing process, from initial observation to completion. ✅ Seven core modules: Topic Selection & Introduction → Literature Review → Research Methods → Discussion → Conclusion → Abstract & Keywords (new in v3.1) → Full Text Integration. Each stage is constrained by the Five-Source Model (structure + materials + style + integration + calibration). ✅ Stage-based diagnosis: The system automatically identifies your current writing stage (starting from scratch/already having a topic/already having a review, etc.) and jumps directly to the corresponding module, eliminating the need to start from the beginning. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall: It mandates the submission of real literature/data, with the B-core having veto power to reject any "illusionary content" without supporting materials, ensuring academic rigor. ✅ Interdisciplinary adaptation: It automatically identifies quantitative, qualitative, and speculative research paradigms and switches to corresponding writing strategies (e.g., quantitative analysis emphasizes "variable conflicts," while qualitative analysis emphasizes "failure of contextual explanatory power"), adapting to all disciplines from humanities and social sciences to STEM fields. After opening, simply tell the system "Which stage am I at?" + "My subject area" to start. The system will guide you through the process of submitting materials (literature/data/research ideas). Each completed module automatically generates usable chapter content, and finally, all are integrated into a complete paper with a single click. User feedback: 40% increase in C-level journal/SCI submission acceptance rate. v3.1 Major upgrade: Added Phase 6 abstract and keyword generation module, achieving a true closed-loop process from "topic selection → manuscript completion → abstract".
Thesis Topic Selection and Introduction Writing System v3.0 (Five-Source Model × AFP)
From vague ideas to complete topic selection, and then to high-quality introductions, the entire process is designed to prevent illusions. ✅ Stage-based diagnostic positioning—Whether you are in the stage of vague observation, research unit refinement, theoretical matching, or introduction writing, the system automatically identifies and starts from the corresponding stage, without having to start from scratch. ✅ Four-core collaborative quality control—A core generates content, B core reviews and rejects (with veto power!), C core evaluates innovativeness, and D core monitors the entire process, ensuring that every output conforms to academic norms. ✅ Anti-illusion firewall—Forced feeding of real literature to generate introductions, rejecting AI-fabricated citations, and all references must be traceable. ✅ Automatic switching of interdisciplinary methodologies—After recognizing your professional background, the system automatically calls the corresponding methodology (humanities and social sciences: Q-method, fantasy topic analysis; science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine: machine learning, multi-omics analysis), without requiring you to understand the details of the methodology. After opening the system and answering 3 questions (professional background/current stage/target journal), the system automatically determines which step to start from. Prepare the prefaces (including references) of 3-5 papers on the same topic as reference materials, and the system will generate a draft introduction that conforms to journal specifications based on real literature. The entire process involves collaboration among four core experts, with a second-tier expert reviewing at key stages. Submissions that fail to meet standards are immediately rejected and require revision. The program covers all disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, and is compatible with submissions to journals at all levels, including CSSCI, SCI, and Peking University core journals.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.
