A Japanese Apple-style comparison table for reviewing design skill requirements and implementation status across three products.
Goal: Create a polished Apple-style Japanese comparison matrix infographic showing which Apple Design Skill review items have implementation impact across three products: Flow River, Orbit Canvas, Arc Day.
Canvas: Vertical portrait poster, 768 × 1152 px, warm off-white background with subtle paper grain and a faint mint gradient glow near the top right. Center a large rounded white table card with a soft shadow, leaving generous margins. Use a restrained Apple-like editorial style: clean grid, thin dividers, rounded status symbols, muted teal, pale yellow, dusty pink, and gray.
Header: At top left, small uppercase teal label “APPLE DESIGN SKILL · IMPLEMENTATION IMPACT”. Below it, large Japanese headline スキルが効いた設計項目. Under the headline, add a small gray Japanese description explaining that these are Apple Design Skill items summarized by implementation impact and grouped by initial prototype, skill principles, and later correction/implementation work. At top right place a compact legend with exactly 4 status symbols: teal circle = 合格, yellow triangle = 一部, red X = 未対応, gray dash = 対象外.
Main layout: A wide table with exactly 5 columns: “スキル番”, “Apple Designレビュー項目”, and the 3 product columns named by Flow River, Orbit Canvas, Arc Day. Use a dark charcoal header row with white text. First two columns are wider; three product columns are equal width. Align item numbers left in teal, item descriptions left in bold dark text, and status symbols centered.
Sections: Use exactly 4 grouped sections with colored band headers:
1. Teal band: “A. スキルが明確に効いた項目 実装・修正・ブラッシュアップ検証まで完了 SKILL IMPACT”. Contains exactly 17 rows: §1 Pointer-downで即時反応; §2 Pointer Events・1:1追従・Pointer Capture; §3 動作中に掴み直せる中断可能性; §4 離れる対象へのスプリング採用; §5 指の速度をスプリングへ引き継ぐ; §7 往復経路の対称性・操作元へのアンカー; §9 境界での段階的なラバーバンド抵抗; §12 半透明Materialによる階層と奥行き; §12 Surfaceサイズに応じたBlur・Shadow重量; §14 Reduced TransparencyでSolid化; §14 Prefers Contrastで境界を強化; §16.1 Purpose:目的が明確で不要機能を抑制; §16.6 Simplicity:主要機能と情報階層の明快さ; §16.7 Craft:文字・間隔・動作の意図的な精度; §16 Wayfinding:現在地・行先・退出方法; §16 Grouping & Mapping:操作と対象の近接; §17 VisualとInteractionを一体設計.
2. Pale yellow band: “B. 一部効いた・改善が必要な項目 原則は反映したが完全実装ではない”. Contains exactly 10 rows: §6 速度から開始する予測するMomentum Projection; §8 途中フレームが操作結果の方向を示す; §10 タップ余白・ドラッグ閾値・キャンセル設計; §11 フレーム品質・compositor向け更新; §14 Reduced Motionで意味的動きへ置換; §15 サイズ別Tracking・Leading・Weight階層; §16.2 Agency:選択・取り消し・失敗からの回復; §16.4 Familiarity:既知の比喩と予測可能な挙動; §16.8 Delight:余白品質から生まれる高揚感; §16 状態・完了・警告・エラーのFeedback.
3. Dusty pink band: “C. 未対応・未検証項目 スキルが示す次の改善対象”. Contains exactly 3 rows: §15 Dynamic Typeに合わせたLayout拡張; §16.5 Flexibility:状況・環境・能力への適応; §17 実利用時・実環境でのテスト.
4. Light gray band: “D. 機能特性上の対象外 未達ではなく、今回のUIに適用領域がない”. Contains exactly 2 rows: §13 音・触覚を同期/即時性/有用性で統合; §16.3 Responsibility:安全・プライバシー・透明性.
Status pattern: Populate all 32 item rows with centered symbols. Section A is mostly teal circles, with a few gray dashes in Flow River and Arc Day matching the look of partial non-applicable cases. Section B mixes teal circles, yellow triangles, and gray dashes, including one red X in the middle product column on the row for tap margin/drag threshold/cancel design. Section C is mostly red X marks, with yellow triangles in some right-side cells. Section D uses gray dashes across all three product columns. Make the symbols small, rounded, lightly tinted, and consistent with the legend.
Footer: Add a tiny gray Japanese note at bottom left beginning with “総括方針:” and a small source note at bottom right Source: apple-design SKILL.md §9–17. Keep the table crisp and readable, no decorative illustrations, no people, no logos besides the text label, no watermark.